Arsenal’s transfer dealings are under incessant scrutiny almost year-round. Fans of the club and fans of football in general regard Arsenal as a club that hesitates to spend money.
They would seem to be correct based on the Gunner’s history in the transfer window. The 40 million and one pound bid for Luis Suarez in 2013 would suggest that all the scrutiny is fair.
Their history of selling their best players also provides football fans with all the more reason to criticize in suggesting to fans that the club does not believe in winning trophies.
Is this a just criticism?
If we consider the components necessary to win the Premier League, we should believe that it is indeed a just criticism. The most important component of a team is talent. If a team does not have the ability to win consistently, they will not last the course of 38 matches with the best record.
Arsenal has always been a club with good players and high expectations, but we should no longer regard them in this manner. Their history of selling the best talent suggests a closer examination of their true ambitions.
Arsenal Selling To Chelsea and Man City
Ashley Cole – At the time, the Englishman was one of the best left-backs in England. He was also only 25 years old—a player nearing the peak of his career. The decision to sell to a direct rival in Chelsea boggled the minds of Arsenal fans. Why did they sell him? The reason for selling the player was to fund construction of the Emirate Stadium. Selling players does generate money and is a valid reason but not a valid reason to sell to a major rival.
Emmanuel Adebayor – Adebayor was the Gunners’ best scorer when he left in 2009. He was attempting to fill the shoes of Thierry Henry, a nearly impossible task. Even after playing well, however, that did not stop Arsenal cashing in on the striker. The departure to the Citizens happened amid anger and turmoil as it looked as though he wanted the move for more money. This deal was another calamity from Arsenal’s perspective with more strength going to one of their adversaries.
Samir Nasri – One of the side’s best players at the time of his sale. The Frenchman was coming off one of his best seasons with Arsenal, scoring 15 goals from his midfield position.
Another player sold to a direct rival. Manchester City went on to win the league the next year with the help of the player Arsene Wenger had developed. Again, we heard the argument of the stadium funding. At this point it was 2011, the stadium had been built in 2006 and 5 years had passed. The stadium cost 390 million pounds, but Arsenal generates enormous amounts of money every season. The club has the highest ticket prices nearly every year. The argument of stadium funding is becoming very tenuous at this point.
Arsenal Selling To Barcelona
Thierry Henry – Undisputedly Arsenal’s greatest ever player. This transfer was a little more tolerable. Henry is the club’s best player and every good player desires to win trophies. He judged the team he left to be too young and immature to win titles, so he moved to Barcelona. With Barcelona he had an extremely good chance of success. He did not merely move for an outrageous paycheck. Also, he did not move to a direct competitor. This transfer is easier to understand and does not suggest Arsenal is a “selling team”. Yes they sold their best player, but it wasn’t to a rival, and they did have a new stadium that needed financing.
Cesc Fabregas – A similar sale to that of Henry. He didn’t go to a direct rival, and he left to win trophies. Also, when Barcelona beckons, it is very hard to turn them down. Fabregas came up through the youth system at Barcelona, which made the decision to leave even more tempting. This transfer is more understanding because of its nature. It didn’t enhance the teams around us and we were sending a player back to his boyhood club.
Arsenal Selling To Manchester United
The worst departures of all, however, were the sales of Robin van Persie and Alexis Sanchez to Manchester United.
Van Persie is the best goalscorer at Arsenal since Henry. He had just come off a stellar season, scoring 30 goals, and winning the golden boot award. The summer was a very dark place for Arsenal fans, however. The Gunners faithful were outraged when they heard their best player would join Manchester United. How could they sell the best striker in the league to one of their biggest rivals?
It was a very difficult transfer to comprehend, and not just for Arsenal fans, but football fans in general. The stadium financing argument was thrown about again, but this did not warrant selling to a direct rival (who would go on to win the league with RVP as their top scorer).
The most recent sale of Alexis Sanchez has completely demolished the argument of paying for the Emirates. It has been 12 years since the stadium has been built. Also, according to all media, there was no transfer of money between the clubs. Arsenal received Henrikh Mhkitaryan in return for Alexis with no funds being exchanged. Once again, the best player in the side was sold to one of their number one adversaries.
Analyzing each major departure from Arsenal
The transfers of Ashley Cole, Emmanuel Adebayor, Samir Nasri, Robin van Persie, and Alexis Sanchez show us that Arsenal have been correctly branded as a “selling club”. Selling players to strengthen close adversaries is not something that happens frequently and is extremely rare.
With Arsenal it has become a regular occurrence. They have sold a player of high quality to a rival almost once every five years. This history of selling tells us all we need to know about the club’s ambition for the future. The hierarchy at the club is content with top 5 finishes. They are not a winning team. We have seen it for the last 12 years and we will see it in the future, unless some big changes are made and some big names are replaced.
200+ Channels With Sports & News
- Starting price: $33/mo. for fubo Latino Package
- Watch Premier League, World Cup, Euro 2024 & more
Live & On Demand TV Streaming
- Price: $35/mo. for Sling Blue
- Watch Premier League, World Cup & MLS
Many Sports & ESPN Originals
- Price: $9.99/mo. (or get ESPN+, Hulu & Disney+ for $13.99/mo.)
- Features Bundesliga, LaLiga, Championship, & more
2,000+ soccer games per year
- Price: $4.99/mo
- Features Champions League, Serie A, Europa League & NWSL
175 Premier League Games & PL TV
- Starting price: $4.99/mo. for Peacock Premium
- Watch 175 exclusive EPL games per season
110+ channels, live & on-demand
- Price: $59.95/mo. for Plus Package
- Includes FOX, FS1, ESPN, TUDN & more
- FOX Sports to feature US Soccer float in Macy’s Parade
- FOX says US-England could rank in top 5 biggest games ever
- Umbro’s USA away kit better than Nike’s World Cup effort
- Man City vs Man United: TV coverage details
- Potter magic seals first league win as Chelsea boss
- Bundesliga in talks with private equity firms to sell media rights
- Gareth Bale debuts own craft beer ahead of World Cup
- Arsenal extend Adidas kit deal until 2030 on eve of derby win
- Where to find Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea on US TV
- Where to find Liverpool vs. Brighton on US TV