
<p>Allegations surfaced that Manchester City accepted $38 million in illegal funds from a “mystery” sponsorship in the United Arab Emirates. The “Britain’s Biggest Football Scandal?” documentary highlighted the unreleased report from UEFA’s Club Financial Control Board. </p>



<p>UEFA completed an official report in 2020 according to widespread opinion. However, the governing body never released the information. The investigation claims that the 2012 and 2013 payments made up for funds that were originally expected to arrive from one of City’s big sponsors.</p>



<p>UEFA officials, according to the documentary, City received $19 million in two installments in 2012 and 2013. That consisted of nonexistent sponsorship money. The FA cited these money transfers as evidence in February. Back then, it accused the club of <a href="https://worldsoccertalk.com/news/man-city-allegedly-broke-financial-rules-more-than-100-times-20230206-WST-418752.html">breaking 115 financial regulations</a> set by the <a href="https://worldsoccertalk.com/premier-league-tv-schedule/">Premier League</a>.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<div class="ck-youtube"><iframe loading="lazy" title="BRITAIN&apos;S BIGGEST FOOTBALL SCANDAL?" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LlLRWw47HOk?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>
</div></figure>



<h2>Manchester City sponsorship scandal latest financial hiccup</h2>



<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/nov/08/manchester-city-roberto-mancini-abu-dhabi-money-second-contract-sheikh-mansour" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Other claims</a> say the club paid former manager Roberto Mancini a total of $4.72 million. Just $1.83 million came on the club’s books. The rest was from Al Jazira Sports and Cultural Club. The owner of Al Jazira is City’s majority shareholder, Sheikh Mansour.</p>



<p>UEFA questioned a club attorney and identified “Jaber Mohamed” as the payer. The governing body characterized him as “a person in the business of providing financial and brokering services to commercial entities in the UAE.”</p>



<h5>City escaped Champions League ban prior to winning it</h5>



<p>A four-year investigation investigating their actions from 2015/16 to 2017/18 led to the club being found guilty this winter. The Premier League then sent the case to an impartial panel. Following investigations, the English side faced charges of ‘serious breaches’ of financial fair play regulations. This was during the period from 2012 to 2016.</p>



<p>Consequently, they received a two-year ban from the <a href="https://worldsoccertalk.com/champions-league-tv-schedule/">UEFA Champions League</a>. However, the club chose to appeal the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), which ultimately overturned the ban and reduced the associated fine from $38 million to $13 million.</p>



<p><em>PHOTO: IMAGO / PA Images</em></p>


Allegations have surfaced that a "mystery" sponsorship from the United Arab Emirates paid $38 million to Manchester City illegally.

Manchester City embroiled in $38m fake sponsorship scandal

<p>I’m just going to come right out and say it: I suck at Photoshop.</p>
<p>A year ago, a Digital Photography course I had to take for my degree at university pushed me head-first into the world of photo-doctoring.  Not to the point where we were creating things that weren’t there, but just touching pictures up so that they looked more aesthetically pleasing.  I got out of the class with a solid A, but I didn’t then and I wouldn’t now call myself an expert.</p>
<p>Other people are, though, and fair play to them.  However, when some of these supposed artists’ work – namely fake football shirt designs – hits the presses otherwise known as the Internet, I can’t help but ponder the following:</p>
<p>Shouldn’t we have anything better to do with our lives?</p>
<p>I realize that morbid curiosity gets the best of pretty much everybody at some stage, but sometimes I really do fear for those who fall at the first few hurdles.  If you want a case in point, we’re right in the middle of a pretty big one at the moment, with tech-savvy prognosticators trying to predict what Adidas, Nike, Umbro, Canterbury, Under Armour – Yes, really.  Hannover 96 must protect this house! – and all the rest of the kit manufacturers are going to be coming up with for club and national sides for the upcoming season.</p>
<p>That’s fine, except that by my math, ‘next season’ for a lot of those teams is around about <em>five months away</em>.</p>
<p>To help put this into perspective, allow me to throw in a personal anecdote.  The club I support, Manchester City, is in its second year of a contract with French kit manufacturer Le Coq Sportif – Which translates into English as ‘The Sporty Rooster.’  …Yeah, okay. – and has travel agency Thomas Cook as their main sponsor.  Both of these things are set to change next season, with City changing manufacturers (to Umbro) and possibly sponsors (to Etihad Airways).</p>
<p>I’m not going to speak for all City fans here, but frankly even that bit about next year’s kits is more than I’m really all that bothered to know at present, especially when I’m much more concerned with what’s going on more immediately with a club that’s still very much alive in the UEFA Cup and battling to retain their place in Europe for next season.  Therefore, you can imagine that I might have been a wee bit annoyed the other day to find that the blog <a href="http:\/\/todosobrecamisetas.blogspot.com/2009/03/manchester-city-umbro-kit-0910.html">Todos Sobre Camisetas</a> had unearthed the Blues’ supposed new home shirt for the 2009-10 campaign…or so they and we are all led to think.</p>
<p>On the surface, it’s all there: club badge on the left (from the wearer’s perspective), Umbro logo on the right, ‘Etihad Airways’ emblazoned in block letters on the middle of the chest.  The only problem?  It looks just like the supposed new <a href="http:\/\/epltalk.com/new-0911-england-home-shirt-revealed/4390">England home shirt</a> that has been making the rounds on Internet football sites.  Which may or may not actually be the real thing.  And is supposedly going to retail at a recession-tastic £50.</p>
<p>It’s with that last point in mind, then, that I put out the following question: Why are we encouraging this?  I suppose there is the possibility that a lot of these ‘insiders’ are just wind-up merchants and/or supporters of other teams that are trying to get a rise out of rival fans, but I fail to see what purpose that serves.</p>
<p>Premiership clubs&nbsp; evidently reserve the right to come out with the following season’s kits before the last one’s even finished anyway – See among others Chelsea wearing this season’s ‘new’ kit in the Champions League final last summer – thereby giving fans something to tide them over during the summer, which in my mind makes this plagiari…er, art of creating fake kit designs ultimately kind of pointless.</p>
<p>Then again, maybe I just have more pressing issues to worry about.</p>


ALL POSTS TAGGED "Etihad"

Leagues: Premier League

Manchester City embroiled in $38m fake sponsorship scandal

General

Photoshop, Football Shirts, The Recession, And Maybe Not You Personally, But…