Sign up for the free daily World Soccer Talk email newsletter for news and soccer TV schedules »

SAT, 2:30PM ET

Leicester City vs Man United, 1976: Video

Usually during international breaks I find myself having more time to reflect on the Premier League, what it is and where it came from. After crawling around YouTube, I uncovered the above video which I thought would be eye-opening to many readers of EPL Talk, to have a better idea of what English football used to be like as well as how it was produced for television.

In this example, Granada Television presents “The Kick Off Match,” a weekly highlights show featuring, in this episode, Leicester City against Manchester United in the fifth round of the FA Cup in 1976. Gerald Sinstadt opened the programme and commentated on the match in a program that feels very 1970-ish.

In this match, there are several legends from the 1970s playing including Frank Worthington, Jimmy Greenhoff, Sammy McIlroy, Steve Coppell, Alex Stepney and Gordon Hill.

What are the interesting observations you notice about the game, the style of play and the TV production? Click the comments link below and share your feedback.

Frank Worthington
Steve Coppell
Alex Stepney
Sammy McIlroy
Gordon Hill
Jimmy Greenhoff

This entry was posted in General, Leagues: EPL. Bookmark the permalink.

About Christopher Harris

Founder and publisher of World Soccer Talk, Christopher Harris is the managing editor of the site. He has been interviewed by The New York Times, The Guardian and several other publications. Plus he has made appearances on NPR, BBC World, CBC, BBC Five Live, talkSPORT and beIN SPORT. Harris, who has lived in Florida since 1984, has supported Swansea City since 1979. He's also an expert on soccer in South Florida, and got engaged during half-time of a MLS game. Harris launched EPL Talk in 2005, which was rebranded as World Soccer Talk in 2013.
View all posts by Christopher Harris →

10 Responses to Leicester City vs Man United, 1976: Video

  1. Blackcloud says:

    I’ll start with the most glaring difference: everyone is white and British (probably English, I’d reckon). I’ve seen highlights from a decade later that were the same. I suspect that didn’t really change until the advent of the PL.

    No kit sponsors. Back passes to the keeper legal. It’s not enough of a sample to determine how different the style of play is or isn’t compared to the standards of today.

    The production is basic. One camera, one angle, one replay (marked with that quaint ‘R’). No Fox Box or other graphic to indicate score, time, and half. Looks like a film camera, too, although that might just be because it’s for the highlight show. I couldn’t say what kind of feed was provided for live television.

  2. Tim says:

    The numbers on the back of the jersey meant something

  3. Curtis says:

    There was full defense for each set piece (all 10 were behind the ball). I don’t know if that was a general trend or just for this game. It made playing the ball out of danger less effective.

    Leicester had the long throw. It was interesting to see legal backpasses.

    The all white and British was very glaring.

  4. ovalball says:

    Those guys were much better athletes than today’s players.

    I make that statement based on the fact that despite numerous kicks, bumps, etc. not one player ever went to ground. Every single “victim” kept to his feet and continued play. What agility. What skill. Absolutely amazing!!!

  5. Jose says:

    Everyone minus the referee had the same hairstyle.

    No one was flapping or flopping about. Players would either take or avoid the contact and keep going, rather then looking for or embellishing it. I didn’t see anyone rolling or crying on the ground. Players were interested in playing the game, not the referee.

    Seemed to be less emphasis on crosses and the wide game, more play down the middle.

    • The Gaffer says:

      Good point about the lack of crosses, Jose. So many games these days are boring and predictable when you see teams floating the ball into the box and the defenders knocking the ball away.

      The other interesting thing I noticed is that when it was a throw-in, you didn’t get players from both teams raising their hand to convince the referee it was their team’s throw-in.

      The Gaffer

  6. Scott says:

    Found it interesting that both teams were wearing dark colored kits. It’s my understanding (and I could be totally wrong) that American sports primarily wear dark and light uniforms to allow people watching in black & white to differentiate the teams.

    Now, there aren’t many b&w pics anymore, but I’d imagine a lot of people were still using b&w tv in 1976…I remember them being fairly common well into the late 80s.

  7. Taylor says:

    Love the one substitute!

  8. Ford Prefect says:

    Ok, strange thought here, but I kept thinking how much the announcer sounded like Eric Idle when the Pythons used to do the sports skits, esp the football match btw the greek and german philosophers

  9. Blackcloud says:

    Baseball had different home (white) and away (gray) jerseys long before anyone had an inkling of TV. Usually that is what what the light and dark colors represent, although with the advent of alternate uniforms, that can no longer be taken for granted. But generally in the US that’s what the colors mean, although it’s not standard across the leagues, since in the NHL and NFL the home team wears dark or colored uniforms, whereas in MLB and the NBA it usually wears white or light colors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>