Sign up for the free World Soccer Talk daily email newsletter for TV schedules, news and more »

SUN, 8:30AM ET
NEW0
SUN1
SUN, 11AM ET
LIV2
ARS2
SUN, NOON ET
BEN
GIL
SUN, 3PM ET
ATH
ATL
SUN, 3PM ET
INT
LAZ
SUN, 3PM ET
BOR
LYO

College Soccer: Is it relevant?

 College Soccer: Is it relevant?

Following the College Cup triumph of the Maryland Terps numerous columns online have been penned attacking the quality and attractiveness of NCAA Soccer. Ives Galarcep had a well written and thoughtful response to these critics in his Soccer by Ives column of Monday. The most galling thing about the criticism the College Cup has received is that much of it are from the same writers who are never willing to objectively analyze the product that Major League Soccer produces on a weekly basis. Perhaps it has become fashionable to blame the shortcomings and failures of MLS on an inadequate college soccer system.

Once you get beyond all the peculiarities of College Soccer, the same types of strange rules that the NASL had and MLS initially had, I find the product to be little different than MLS. Let’s face it: by the standard of a European football fan, MLS borders on unwatchable most of the time. It isn’t simply the quality of play in MLS, but the style of play. I’ve spoken to more than a handful of British ex-pats who have told me they prefer USL to MLS: but this clearly isn’t about quality because USL is not of the same standard as MLS with the exception of two or three clubs (the same clubs that are successful in CONCACAF play.) Their stated preference for USL is based around familiarity with the style of play which resembles British Football far more than MLS’ developing Latinized style. While I watch MLS, I cannot claim to be any more compelled by MLS or USL than I am by NCAA Soccer. All three have their drawbacks and limitations for those who appreciate the sport. MLS is a much more presentable product in how it is marketed and packaged than NCAA Soccer or USL (who promotion is probably worse than your local AAU Basketball league), but when you get beyond the glitz and clever promotion, MLS as I have repeatedly stated is not a consistently quality product.

The tactics in College Soccer resemble more of hybrid of North European (but not British) football and lower tier leagues in Latin America. While the style of play and peculiar rules may not be appealing to many, College Soccer most certainly has its clear benefits to player development in North America. A number of former college soccer players now ply their trade in top European leagues, including Blackburn captain Ryan Nelson (Stanford), Rangers’ Mo Edu (Maryland), Spurs Paul Stalteri (Clemson), Hammarby’s Charlie Davies (Boston College), Standard Liege’s Oguchi Onyewu (Clemson), Aston Villa’s Brad Friedel (UCLA) as well as MLS standouts like Shalrie Joseph (St Johns), Taylor Twellman (Maryland), and three time MLS Cup champion striker Alejandro Moreno (UNC Greensboro).

An interesting suggestion for improving College Soccer appeared this week on Soccerlens. This piece certainly has some very valid points, although knowing the NCAA the way I do I am of the belief that a two semester season will never be permitted. Much like Baseball whose one semester season including practice limits the development of players, Soccer is not given a high emphasis in many ways by the NCAA.

A solution could be for the PDL to develop further its relationship with NCAA Soccer under the auspices of the US Soccer Federation. The NCAAs lack of consistency from sport to sport as the Soccerlens piece discusses is a drawback to College Soccer’s development. Men’s Soccer is only a priority in a handful of athletic departments. The sport plays a fairly prominent role on several mid Atlantic campuses (ACC schools outside of Florida and Georgia in other words) as well as Indiana University, U Conn, SMU, St Johns, UCLA and a few other schools that I have neglected to mention. However, only the ACC actually promotes Men’s Soccer publicly as a major sport in its league, and thus the NCAA as well as individual athletic departments do not place a priority in their clearinghouses on soccer players.

Those who favor a European style development system for football in the United States are barking up the wrong tree. Our peculiar system of developing athletes in this country for very Americanized sports who face little international competition (while Americans like to think of Basketball as big worldwide sport, only in the US do the nation’s top athletes play Basketball: around the rest of the globe a nation’s top athletes generally are footballers or enter other sports unpopular in US media like Rugby, Cricket, or individual sports.) is not suited to football. However the system in this country is never going to be radically changed without significant state (government) support or huge private sector investment. With neither possibility realistically on the horizon an effort must be made by fans of the game in this country as well as the football media to support NCAA Soccer and work to make the changes necessary to develop a more useful model for player development within the constraints of the college system.


This entry was posted in Leagues: Major League Soccer, NCAA Soccer. Bookmark the permalink.

About Kartik Krishnaiyer

A lifelong lover of soccer, the beautiful game, he served from January 2010 until May 2013 as the Director of Communications and Public Relations for the North American Soccer League (NASL). Raised on the Fort Lauderdale Strikers of the old NASL, Krishnaiyer previously hosted the American Soccer Show on the Champions Soccer Radio Network, the Major League Soccer Talk podcast and the EPL Talk Podcast. His soccer writing has been featured by several media outlets including The Guardian and The Telegraph. He is the author of the book Blue With Envy about Manchester City FC.
View all posts by Kartik Krishnaiyer →