FRI, 2:30PM ET
MET
PSG
FRI, 2:30PM ET
BIL
ESP
SAT, 10AM ET
WOL
FOR
SAT, 10AM ET
CHE
WBA
SAT, 10AM ET
MCFC
SWA
SAT, 12:30PM ET
ARS
MUFC

Watford Call For Goal-Line Technology After Controversy in Championship [VIDEO]

goal line technology Watford Call For Goal Line Technology After Controversy in Championship [VIDEO]

Goal-line technology was thankfully introduced in the Premier League at the start of this season. It had been in the pipeline for quite some time and finally eradicated the controversy surrounding the ball crossing the line – an issue that became impossible to ignore following England’s 4-1 defeat to Germany in the last 16 of the 2010 World Cup in South Africa.

Thanks to the technology, England’s top flight is benefiting from fewer controversies ruining games. Surely the same should apply to the rest of the English Football League, correct? Sadly no, and Brighton’s controversial 1-1 draw against Watford last week has ignited the debate.

After scoring a goal in the fourth minute, Watford had a shot that clearly crossed the line. The Brighton footballer kicked the ball out of the goal, but when viewed in slow-motion, TV viewers could see that the ball had clearly crossed the line. The goal was not given, and Brighton eventually went on to draw the game 1-1. In the very competitive league of the Championship, two dropped points could make a major difference if Watford miss out on a promotion playoff place at the end of the season.

Watford manager Gianfranco Zola has led the calls for goal-line technology to be introduced into the Championship. Does he have a case and should it also be introduced to the other professional leagues in England?

In my opinion, if the technology is good enough for the Premier League, England’s second tier must follow suit. The Championship is the fourth most watched league in Europe – it really matters. Promotion to the top flight is worth over £100 million to clubs. The mistake last night could end up costing Watford a place in the Premier League, yet it could easily be eradicated.

So why is the Football League reluctant to introduce goal-line technology? Installing and maintaining the technology is a very expensive process. Whilst there are wealthy clubs in the Championship, the vast majority of clubs in League One and League Two would simply be unable to afford it. Even in the Championship, the image of special cameras being set up all over Huish Park seems somewhat farcical.

Furthermore, would the technology be used regularly enough to make it a prudent investment? It is a valid point. The sort of incident experienced between Brighton and Watford only occurs a few times a season.

However, this is clearly a relevant and important issue. The Football League has announced that it is considering whether to introduce goal-line technology in the latter rounds of the Capital One Cup. Furthermore, it is open to the possibility of introducing the system into future league fixtures.

Expect this debate to continue for the foreseeable future. With so much financial repercussions at stake, effectively deeming the Premier League more deserving of cutting-edge technology than the Championship is a bold claim.

Editor’s note: Read the latest news, opinion and analysis about the Championship.

This entry was posted in Goal Line Technology, Leagues: Championship, Watford. Bookmark the permalink.

About Nick Ottman

Watford season ticket holder. I quite like football. Law with French student at the University of Nottingham, currently spending my year abroad in Toulouse. I'm occasionally funny on twitter as well @nick_ottman
View all posts by Nick Ottman →

7 Responses to Watford Call For Goal-Line Technology After Controversy in Championship [VIDEO]

  1. Tony Butterworth says:

    IT’s expensive. The PL makes orders of magnitude the money that the Championship does. Sure it would be better if they had it but is the Championship more important than League 1 etc. etc, it never ends.

    It’s completely understandable.

  2. andy denton says:

    I see you study Law, Nick, so a bit surprising that you post a video showing (from the crucial side-on view) that the whole of the ball has not crossed the whole of the line but state the officials made a “mistake”.
    Goal-line technology (in this case) would have probably confirmed that the original decision was actually correct.

    • Nick Ottman says:

      There is absolutely no doubt it was over the line.

      • andy denton says:

        Can you explain the logic behind your statement?
        The last frame of the video clip indicates that the ball has not fully crossed the line – are you saying the side-on view is flawed?
        (or do you actually not know the laws of football very well?)

  3. John says:

    The side on view is impacted by the side bar. If you notice on the head on view there is a pretty significant patch of grass between the goal line and the ball itself.

    • andy denton says:

      the side on view is positioned right along the byline so the “side bar” (aka post) basically represents the goalline – as it is exactly the same width.

      The fact you can see a grass from the head on view doesn’t necessarily mean the ball is over – you’d have to see a patch of grass more than the radius of the ball (about 11cm) for the whole ball to be over.
      Can yo definitely say there is 11cm of grass visible from the head on view?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>