TV Ratings May Get Even Better For MLS
As we go through this first season of Major League Soccer’s contract with NBC Sports, we’ve read many a story about the way that the league has received increased exposure (here’s one). The move from FOX Soccer to NBC Sports Network (and NBC to a lesser extent) constituted a fundamental change the number of matches shown, and how many people have access to that action.
It’s clear that FOX Soccer has a limited distribution in the United States, while NBCSN has continued to gain traction through its extensive coverage of the Olympics. We’ve seen the minor tiff between FOX and MLS over the spring-to-fall schedule issue, though why should MLS even listen when FOX seemed unwilling to produce original creative content for the league?
NBC Sports Network recently began a series called MLS 36, a spinoff of the NHL 36 documentary series they have run about pro hockey in North America. Their first episode followed leading goal scorer Chris Wondolowski for 36 hours, and the second centered around Fredy Montero in the hours before the US Open Cup final. The show has been airing directly after MLS matches on the network, and while its unclear how it’s doing from a ratings standpoint, it can’t hurt the league’s image. And when you go from being treated as an afterthought to getting real promotional efforts from a network, that’s a clear upgrade in stature.
And the news seems to get better for MLS. According to reports from a subscriber newsletter, DirecTV will move NBC Sports Network from channel 603 to channel 220 in September 2012. For those of us who are dedicated soccer fans subscribing to DirecTV, we are used to rummaging up around the 600′s to find FOXSoccer and GolTV (channel 620 on DirecTV will soon become beInSportUSA if you haven’t heard, covering La Liga, Serie A, and Ligue 1). For the casual fan who hangs out around the low 200′s where ESPN’s networks reside, this could potentially be a major boost in profile and exposure.
I imagine that the National Hockey League played a significant part in NBCSN’s move to the lower reaches, but MLS can absolutely reap the benefits of this jump. September and October hold 9 matches slated to be aired on NBCSN, plus 5 combined on ESPN and ESPN2. There will also be 3 matches on the flagship NBC network. What a chance for the league to appeal to the casual fan and try to win over some new viewership.
And think about it this way – September and October are also a time for college football on Saturdays. If there’s ever been a time I’ve been flipping around channels during commercials looking for live action, it’s during the college football season. There are so many offerings on, and the commercials become irritating. It may be a stretch to rely on this type of remote-control ADD, but it has to have a better chance of working than airing on a network that only hardcore soccer fans frequent (or even have access to in many cases).
Now it’s not all good though. The Summer Olympics have been a grand spectacle, and the top dog is the Opening Ceremony. There were many appearances by David Beckham in the festivities, yet NBC failed to even mention his employer once. Fortunately for the league, it has received some press in the form of the Honduran U-23 team. Roger Espinoza, Jerry Bengston, Mario Martinez, and Andy Najar are all MLS players who contributed to the Honduran effort at the Olympics, dispatching Spain and giving Silver Medal winners Brazil a run for their money in the quarterfinals.
It will continue to take time, but I think the prospects for MLS’ growth are much brighter in their current situation. So let’s get ready for the stretch run here in 2012. With a second network starting to give serious coverage to the league with improved distribution to many households, popularity should continue to improve for MLS.






59 Responses to TV Ratings May Get Even Better For MLS
Has NBC released the TV ratings for the MLS games that where on
after Olympic sports yet?
I don’t believe so, but here’s hoping it has helped earn some new followers for the league – especially today’s soccer final which was an amazing, exciting match.
I always wonder how accurate this stuff is. For instance, I don’t
have cable (its a racket IMHO) so I watch the highlights on the MLS
website, use MLS Live or ESPN or the radio, and go to a game at
least once a month. I wonder how many there are like me that don’t
have cable but do this. I think that NBC has been a huge
improvement from what I have seen though. I think in general people
get too caught up in ratings. Sure, the big games where teams spend
100 million on their roster get tons of ratings, but from the
numbers that I have seen, nobody really cares about a game like
Everton vs QPR for example. Those games get really bad ratings,
much worse than MLS. The big ratings come from the casual fan, and
we can win them over as the product improves year after year. The
future looks bright I think.
You realize I watched NY Houston in my living room in Seattle last
night. Sure cable is a racket, but who would have thought I would
be able to see that fifteen years ago ?………….The future is
very bright, only a moron MLS hater troll would argue the other
side and they don’t believe the other side, but just pretend to.
The thing that NBC does so well is make you realize how great the
present is. It has never been better in US history for sure, but it
has never been better than most of the countries out there…….we
are very lucky and NBC doesn’t try to convince you it is so much
better elsewhere, it could be so much better, etc etc.
I have ESPN3 so that does the trick for me, as well as MLS Live and
a Roku. The fifty bucks a month I can do without. With that said, I
wish that I had cable and NBCSP (their coverage is great from what
I have seen), but I just can’t justify spending that kinda money
for a couple of channels.
I guess all I was saying is that i don’t get counted in those TV
ratings, and neither do those that do the same as me or that go to
the games. Therefore, the numbers are inaccurate (but still
positive).
It’s true that ratings aren’t the be-all-end-all of popularity. But
the ratings determine ad revenue for the network, which determines
the value of broadcast rights, which is a major part of most
professional league’s revenue. We need increased viewership to be
able to continue to increase the quality of play in the league.
That’s why people get worked up about ratings.
Fair enough. I can see it at that level, but I don’t really see it
in terms of popularity or if people actually care about the league.
I definitely think that it is worth caring about, but people use it
as a tool to say that “see, nobody watches” and I don’t think
that’s accurate.
Yeah revenue and a bunch of trolls that try to put people that
follow MLS down. The only ones that care about TV ratings. The
first group cares because it is their livelyhood….the second
group, hmmm, well, ummm. They just aint too bright.
There are those that do what you do but roughly they are probably
proportional to other sports so it evens out. And besides, it is
the numbers that advertisers care about so in the end it is what
the league and the people looking for the league to succeed care
about.
NBC has been great for anyone that is a fan of US soccer. FOX was a
joke, always looking down on the game and acting like the US
leagues weren’t worth watching……ESPN is a step above, but not
even close to NBC. A MLS 36 on Nagbe. ESPN and FOX don’t know who
Nagbe is………As for NBC not mentioning Beck’s league, everyone
already knows where he plays. NBC is more focused on the superstars
of today and tomorrow, Nagbe being a perfect example.
nagbe is shit. anyways Fox soccer broadcasted MLS, USL, and the
USOC. so i think youre wrong when you say Fox soccer dont care
about US soccer. however it was hard for MLS to break any ground on
FSC because its in direct competitoin with better leagues . NBC
sports is full of B sports like NHL and indy car they needed more A
sports and mls would fit the bill for them. i watched MLS 36 and it
was pretty interesting (albeit i felt scripted) but if mls wants to
stay relevant as NBC sports grows, USSF and MLS will have to
improve its quality or it will receive the same amount of attention
as FSC
FSC broadcast the USOC ? Hmmmm could have sworn I watched the games
streamed until the final which was on GOL TV who out bid FSC ( who
does not care about US soccer )
Charles, obviously FSC didnt air the USOC (or MLS and USL) this
season but it certainly did previous seasons.
I think that is my point however. When other stations actually
cared, we saw that Fox, did not. (As if you couldn’t tell by the
broadcasts). You can’t side with Alex on something like this and
have credibility, he literally does not want MLS as is, to succeed.
I am curious why people rate this comment above negative. What is
there to disagree with?
This blog is infested with trolls.
i’m a big soccer fan but i find it very difficult to get into MLS
for the simple reason it is setup like an American sports like like
the NBA where too many teams make the playoffs. I think there are a
lot of soccer fans like me. So i don’t think it matters whether or
not games are on NBC or FOX or ESPN – a lot of soccer fans don’t
find a regular season that is essentially all about playoff seeding
to be that appealing. I think the dreadful TV ratings for this
league shows that.
I disagree. Most of those soccer fans are casual fans that go for
the big club, big game, and big players. If you look at ratings for
normal league games, MLS fares quite well if not better. Around
150,000 or more are not watching on TV because they are at the
game. Add that to the TV ratings on NBC, ESPN, and local sports
stations, MLS does better than a game like Sunderland vs QPR that
nobody but a small fanbase actually cares about and watches. Those
TV ratings on FOX are well under 100,000 viewers, sometimes under
50,000. Those are horrible TV ratings for “the best league in the
world” that supposedly has “fans”.
how do you know that the soccer fans who do not watch MLS are
casual fans? This is BS. At least provide some evidence..like a
survey or something. As far as ratings…the EPL is on very early
in the morning(sometimes as early as 4:30 am on the west coast) so
it’s silly to compare the ratings. Even so though the EPL gets
better ratings than MLS. MLS does not get good TV ratings. Even the
MLS home office admits this.
I think by definition they are casual. The good team games are the
ones that get good ratings. Following good teams = casual fan for
me. MLS admits the NATIONAL ratings are not good, but they are
unconcerned. They are pleased with local.
they are unconcerned that the national ratings are abysmal? LOL
also…local ratings are very poor as well.
Don’t really see what is funny about growth of the national TV
ratings making where they stand initially irrellevant, but then
again I am communicating with casual fan that found the English
league exciting last year.
So are most of the EPL ratings beyond big matches and big teams. We
know this already.
The playoff race is actually quite exciting right now, as well as
the Supporter’s Shield race. Yes, 8 out of 19 teams would be
better, but to say that the playoff race is not exciting is silly.
The teams at the top are competing for home-field advantage, and
the mid teams are competing just to make it. Teams closer to the
bottom are not out of it yet, but have a huge uphill climb. To say
that the regular season is boring is like saying that qualifying
for the World Cup or Champions League playoffs is boring. Far from
it.
Supporter’s Shield with an unbalanced schedule is just stupid. Even
Bruce Arena thinks so.
Me too. The SS has never really meant much to me at all, win the
big games and take the title.
I wouldn’t go around quoting coaches’ opinions like it’s the
end-all. They aren’t exactly interested parties. I feel pretty
confident that if LA were sitting where San Jose is now Arena would
be saying that the Supporter’s Shield still matters.
dis-interested, not interested
i dont feel it being excited. i will applaud the goons at MLS HQ
for finally deciding that a home field final is better than a
neutral site final (albeit i wish it were a Home Away series like
Copa Libertadores) in the end parity is so saturated in MLS that
IMO home field advantage isnt much of a advantage. over saturation
of parity is my biggest problem from actually enjoying mls. dont
get me wrong i love a tight race but when every team is basically a
carbon copy of each other so identical that the game is basically
up to a coin toss to me that just not very fun. its like watching
little babies try and race you see one actually try, another gets
distracted, one just sits there and cry. idk IMO MLS actually
starts in the post season.
regular seasons that are only for deciding playoff seeding are not
exciting. MLS IS BORING.
Then don’t watch. Simple.
join the club of over 100 million soccer fans in this country
(according to a FIFA report) that cant take mls seriously because
of its americanization of the sport
Again, where are these 100 million fans at? What games are they
watching? Even the CL final got less than 2 percent of that. Most
are casual fans that come around during World Cup time. That’s not
necessarily a bad thing, but its way overstating reality on the
part of FIFA. Where are they getting these numbers?
Dont stop him with facts, he is on a roll ! Next up Pro Rel….come
on, hurry up, it would SAVE US soccer. What are you waiting for
trolls, hurry up !
where is your evidence they are all casual fans?I’m sure some are
but not the majority. I agree that 100 million sounds far fetched.
There is a large % of soccer fans in this country that follow the
national team but don’t follow the domestic league. This is just
anectdotal but i have 20 friends/work aquantinces that are fans of
soccer. They all follow the national team and watch some EPL. A few
of them watches MLS playoffs. But not one of them follows the MLS
regular season. The reason? it’s boring,,,it’s only for deciding
playoff seeding etc.
Regular seasons that go by single table are boring too. The same 3
teams at the top buying championships, the same poor teams at the
bottom of the table. Pretty boring stuff, and very predictable. And
casual fans tune in to the big game(s). What else is a casual fan
if that’s not what they are? Unless they are a big club, nobody is
watching EPL games. Pure and simple. Who is your favorite team/club
if I may ask?
Alan, did you watch this past EPL season? Anything but boring. I
don’t have a fav club team. I root for American players. Fulham,
Bolton, Everton etc.
Are you kidding me? About a year ago I predicted the entire season
on this site. It worked out like I thought. You just have to follow
the money and see which 3 teams are in contention to buy the next
championship. I don’t even care this year. I will tune in to the
big games, but the season itself is boring. This season in MLS is
very interesting if you have been watching.
The EPL wasn’t boring ?……………There were two teams with a
prayer and one of them won it all. The GD for the top team was +69.
How can that NOT be boring. There are only 38 games and the GD for
the top team was +69 ? The third place team was 19 points behind
1st and 2nd, and that was exciting ? You realize that is MORE than
6 victories behind. The league was over at Christmas for any team
not in Manchester. I actually followed it during the MLS offseason.
I will not this year. It is VERY boring. Maybe the reason you don’t
think it is boring, is you don’t care who wins ? Other than that, I
can’t think of an arguement for exciting.
That is probably why the NFL and NBA are hurting for viewers too
huh?
the NFL regular season isn’t all about playoff seeding. It’s
difficult to get into the playoffs. The NBA regular season is a
joke.
The thing is no one will ever be happy and MLS is light years
better off than other leagues were 15 years in their existence.
This is good news for the league and IMO if your a soccer fan you
will follow soccer in this country and ratings will get better with
more accessibility. If you are a casual you will follow only big
euro clubs and still hate on MLS for quality. The difference for me
is that the team i support i can watch on TV and in person while
everyone else has to wake up early on the weekends to only watch
their so called team on TV.
That’s not the only difference. Your team can also end up at the
top or bottom of the table. Most of the “real” and “traditional”
fans pick teams that just happen to be one of the teams that have a
shot at winning the title, but have 0 chance of getting relegated.
I wonder how many of those fans support a team that is now in
nPower as their main club, lol.
“If you are a soccer fan you will follow soccer in this country.”
OUCH, did you mean to give the smackdown beating to the trolls, or
did it just happen as a side consequence ? Trolls ? You just going
to take that ? You bave never made a post about a soccer game in
three to four years, but defend yourself…….At least bring up
Pro Rel !
Why aren’t any of the MLS fan-boys talking about how MLS changed
the tie-breaker rules mid-season?
http://pressbox.mlssoccer.com/content/new-tiebreakers-designed-encourage-attacking-play
On the MLS Talk Podcast, we did.
@Robert………that change of rules in the middle of regular
season is not only very characteristic of a Mickey Mouse league, it
also shows the mentality of our “leaders”, for them our game is not
atracitve as it is, it has to be somehow changed in order to be
sold to americans ( countdown clock, shoot outs , single entity
)…..As long as we don’t find a way of taking the USSF back , it
will be the never ending story. …….I keep saying, fans have to
organize and fight, I don’t see any other way around it ( the total
silence of our journalism doesn’t help either
)………………”You never change things by fighting the
existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes
the existing one obsolete.” – R. Buckminster
Fuller………………we the fans should create a paralel
Federation that ignores the USSF. We should send an open letter to
Fifa explaining our motives and our plan. ……..then create the
structure that is in line with the principles and the spirit of our
game. Publish the criteria that clubs have to meet in order to join
. Make that criteria logical and reasonable, and build our
structure like we should have in the begining, starting with a wide
base of many humble clubs, and build up from there . ( Instead of
creating a fake summit show with no base )
They are not your “leaders” and you are not a “fan”. That’s why
nobody that matters will ever listen to you.
Roger, I agree! Just like those “mickey-mouse” guys at FIFA who
decided to change the number of points for a win from 2 to 3. It’s
a corruption of the original game to help “Americanize” it with
more incentives for a win. Get a life.
Roger you forgot about the best tiebreaker of all !!! IF your
league’s UberTeams are tied after everyone played the full amount
of games, decided it on goal differential ( Man U-Man City, EPL
2011-12 style ) !…………dont stop bro, you on a rooooolllll !
Ohh yes! Let’s talk about a league on the other side of the
atlantic! Let’s talk about Fifa! Let’s ignore how bizarre and
unprofessional is to change tiebreaker criteria in the middle of
the season!
Charles, you have an EPL obsession. Do not forget that the EPL is
just 1 league out of around 99% of all the world leagues that
practice a similar model
EPL is kinda quoted as the benchmark by all the trolls. Everything
has to coincidentally be just like them, and every rating is
compared to them. So yeah, it makes sense that they are brought up.
I’d rather talk about better foreign leagues like Bundesliga, Serie
A, and a lot of the leagues that are south of the border if I were
to ever talk about a foreign league. I mean if all of the trolls
brought up Argentina’s league, that is what we would talk about.
What is our game all about? Among other things, it is about
fighting til the end. It is about believing in the impossible.
………there are just a few minutes left, your club is about to
be relegate or maybe loose the championship, but you believe, you
wait for that miracle until the last second. You suffer, bite your
nails, your hart want to get out of your chest……….the MLS fan
boys will never understand that our game is TOO BIG to fit in their
“entity”………life is the main game, so even though we are
suffering this bizarre reality, we have to believe we can change
it, and fight to do it.
Good stuff. I’ve always been a big fan of the original content.
Anything that helps fans get to know their teams and players a
little better is a good thing. The Champions League series that RSL
did last year, albeit not a television series, basically turned me
into a supporter.
good article. One thing to bear in mind: the NHL is in brutal
contract talks yet again between the owners and the players union,
and a strike could be on the cards again. This would make MLS a
more focal attraction for NBCSN, meaning more advertising and
promoting to make sure they keep bringing in viewers
If the NHL went on strike again and lost another season so soon
after the last would be a death sentence since they are finally
getting back on there feet now.