Analyzing Chelsea’s Success Against Barcelona

Over the past few seasons we have seen Barcelona revolutionize the game in a way that nobody has before. Their ability to retain an incredible amount of possession and slice up opposing defenses has gone unmatched by most teams that try to emulate it or defend against it. However, they are not invincible. Despite their mastery of the style, they remain a very one-dimensional squad and can be easily frustrated at times. The team with the most success against the Catalans has been Chelsea, as evidenced by their 1-0 victory at Stamford Bridge last Wednesday. In a sense, they can be considered as the “nightmare matchup” for Barcelona.

The biggest issue I have with Barcelona’s squad players is the lack of a physical target man up front or in the midfield. On Wednesday, the tallest player on the field for Barcelona was Sergio Busquets. And we have all seen how he reacts to physical contact. Whether or not this kind of player would fit into the system is another debate entirely, but nonetheless it restricts Barcelona into a team that needs to play short, incisive passes through the middle of the field. In my opinion forcing them into wide areas makes them considerably less dangerous.

Chelsea boss Roberto Di Matteo definitely knows this. Previous Chelsea sides, especially in the two semi-final fixtures of 2009, deployed the same type of smart, compact formation that clogs up the middle of the park and uses physicality around the field to frustrate Barcelona. That team was a few controversial decisions away from advancing to the final in Rome. The Blues sat back and allowed Barcelona to retain possession in less than threatening areas, and then muscled them out when they tried to come towards the penalty area.

The same strategy was used last week. Di Matteo used Didier Drogba as the lone striker to try to wreak havoc against an undersized Barcelona backline, and then played five hard-working midfielders that would stay compact in the system. It’s hard to imagine a side seeing just 20% of the ball could win a match and keep a clean sheet, but it is exactly what Chelsea managed to accomplish. A good portion of Barcelona’s possession was spent well outside of areas that would be considered threatening, and they created a low amount of clear-cut chances for having 80% of the ball. The middle of the field was so congested at times that Barcelona were forced into trying to create chances with crosses into the area, and Chelsea were easily able to get those away. Of course they rode their luck with the two shots off the post and some poor finishing by Barca on a few occasions, but as they say, you make your own luck sometimes. Lionel Messi was kept bottled up by John Terry and Gary Cahill, and Barcelona lack another clinical finisher to put chances away regularly, as we saw Wednesday.

All it takes is one chance in a match like that to turn the tides, and Chelsea were able to take advantage of that chance brilliantly. On a rare Messi turnover in midfield, the creativity of Lampard, the pace of Ramires, and the finishing ability of Drogba combined perfectly to produce the winner. Victor Valdes has looked less than stellar in goal on more than a few occasions in the past, and probably should have done better on this particular goal as well. If you manage to force Barcelona into conceding possession, they are more than susceptible to being hit with quick, lethal counter attacks.

This Chelsea side has a great combination of players to try to finish off this tie in the Nou Camp on Tuesday. It will be extremely difficult, and the chances are very good that Barcelona will earn their way through to Munich, but I will give the Blues a fair shot at completing the job. Under Di Matteo’s guidance they have reverted back to the grind-it-out style that has given them success before, and whatever Barcelona does earn, it will have to be very well-earned. Here’s to hopefully another entertaining match on Tuesday.

14 thoughts on “Analyzing Chelsea’s Success Against Barcelona”

  1. Glad to see someone finally stop Barca, but it’s all for naught as I would put my house on them advancing through to the finals. At Camp Nou they are invincible in the truest sense of the word. Also, I know you say Chelsea “made their own luck” in this case, but you need a hell of a lot more than luck if you’re going to be the better team after two legs. With a win at home accomplished with nothing more than the help of the post and the lack of composure by Barca, the Catalans WILL be in the finals again this year. Mark Bob Vance’s words.

  2. Bob, did you watch the Clasico? Clearly they are not invincible at Camp Nou.

    If anything, Madrid & Chelsea have shown exactly how you can stop Barca.

    Madrid were all too happy to concede possession, and were playing with 9 or 10 behind the ball for most of the match.

    As the article points out, Barca’s biggest problem is a lack of a target man. Teams are willing to give Barca width (again – see the Clasico) but they are left playing horizontally for large portions of the match with little to no penetration.

    One thing to note: Barca rested several players this weekend, and with League more or less lost, Pep will bring out all the big guns.

    Fabregas and Sanchez will both start, and there will be diagonal runs from the latter from wide positions. Fabregas will motor forward from midfield. This will mean the Chelsea backline will have to be much wearier when Messi drops deep to collect the ball and create.

    This was the missing piece against Madrid. Messi drew in defenders, but there was no forward surge exploiting the space. I doubt we see this happen again.

    1. You’re too funny Thomas. “One thing to note: Barca rested several players this weekend, and with League more or less lost, Pep will bring out all the big guns.” You just proved my point. To lose to the 2nd best team in the world Barca had to rest players at home, and even then it was a great game. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    2. Furthermore, if you watched the game at the Bridge, Barca had every opportunity to tie and win that game. If you think that Chelsea truly earned that draw you’re mental–Barca had goals on a silver platter that they uncharacteristically failed to convert. Despite the tactics that “stopped” Barcelona, Chelsea scraped up a win at home by the skin of their teeth, nothing more nothing less.

        1. their*

          I’m talking about right here, right now. Not 3 years ago, not 5 years ago. Those games are absolutely irrelevant.

          1. Justin, I don’t like grammar trolls any better than you, but Bob is correct. It should be “their” last six matches. If you don’t understand that that is possessive then perhaps you shouldn’t try to correct the correctors….as annoying as they can be.

            However, Bob could probably use some salt and pepper for that crow. 😉

  3. personally i think chelsea played meh against barcelona. inter played them perfectly. chelsea were much much to wide in midfield, yes they played very narrow bands of 451 but the spaces in the lanes were torn apart by barce quite a bit. honestly barcelona were unlucky to miss 3 very very good chances. considering headers from wide areas were never a concern for chelsea they only reason they played so wide must of been to try and exploit the space behind barce on the counter.
    hopefully they play the same team or there abouts but with an emphasis on narrowness, let barcelona do what the want in the wide areas or in the centre but make them pay when they cross intro chelsea areas. dont rush to close down and dont try to play ball out of midfield because barcelona’s press can get you into trouble very quickly. clear the heck out of the ball into the wings and look for a quick counter goal like last week.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *