SUN, 8:30AM ET
QPR2
LIV3
SUN, 9AM ET
VER1
MIL3
SUN, 11AM ET
STO2
SWA1
SUN, 2:45PM ET
INT
NAP
SUN, 3PM ET
VIL
ALM
SUN, 8:30PM ET
LAG
SEA

England's National Team Is In Crisis

SteveMcclaren50906 228x342 England's National Team Is In Crisis
By John Nicholson

If you’re an England fan, then I will be telling you what you already know, England are in a crisis.

I don’t use the c word very often because in modern day media, a crisis can be anything from a full blown terrorist attack to the local store selling out of bread. The word is used without regard and with no quality control. In fact, in many ways, the only way for anyone to ever get their point of view into the press and on TV is to claim that whatever it is they’re concerned with is ‘in crisis,’; that some kind of imminent calamity is about to befall them.

Usually, this is just not true. For example, in the UK we are routinely told the National Health Service is ‘in crisis.’ You’d think this would mean that there are dead people strewn in the corridors of hospitals and surgeons are performing operations using rusty scissors and a bread knife. But no. Go into any hospital and it looks surprisingly modern and not a corpse rotting anywhere. The crisis, such as it is, is usually the cry of those who want more funding, whether rightly and wrongly. But it’s not a crisis in the true meaning of that word.

However with England’s national team, as you would have seen on Wednesday, it is not too strong a word to use. Why? Because England, a country of 60 million people and almost as many football clubs, has so few international quality players available that its pitiful manager feels it necessary to field players who have not even played a full game yet this season. He feels it necessary to play a man with jet leg and a painful ankle. He plays people out of position because there is no one to naturally play that position.

A few injuries and withdrawals quickly reduce England to a pile of impotent ashes; burnt out and unable to catch fire, they are a mess.

Although I question McClaren’s abilities at this level, I do feel sorry for him. He has so little resources to draw upon. However, there’s no point in pretending, as McClaren does, that somehow, we are still a world power in football. That if we can, by some stroke of luck, get out best 11 on the pitch at the same time, we can achieve great things. Not only is this setting a standard we will always fail to deliver, it is delusional and allows some in the game to continue to put their heads in the sand; to continue to just hope it will all be alright somehow. It won’t.

With less than 70 Englishman to choose from playing in the Premiership regularly, and with many of those players woefully short of basic skills – yes I am thinking of Titus Bramble, there has to be some fearless and revolutionary thinking about England by everyone concerned.

On the radio in recent weeks, many experienced football men have voiced their fears for the future. The likes of Graham Taylor have said clearly there is little or no young talent coming through the academies. Benitez has also confirmed this. Why this is happening is a discussion for another day, but I firmly believe McClaren needs to stand up and grasp this nettle, not pretend that somehow it will all be alright somehow if he just keeps picking the same players. Palpably, it won’t.

He also needs to cast of the yoke of our history and accept we are a second or third rank nation in world football who struggle to beat small east European sides that are drawing on a pool of talent as small as or smaller than our own. If he could do that and if the fans could accept it as the truth, it would free us all up to be more experimental, to try new systems and new players.

England inhibition and conservatism and fear are all borne out of unreasonable expectations. Casting off the notion that we should be really good would remove that expectation. We could take new directions without fear. If they fail to work, at least we’d have learned something but maybe they wouldn’t fail. Maybe we’d unearth new quality players who can play at international level. We simply don’t give enough players a chance. Why wasn’t Derbyshire given a chance on Wednesday for instance?

Maybe we’d develop an ability to play any system, not just 4-4-2. Maybe we’d feel free to play creative football for a change and not just end every game hoofing it long and losing possession which has been our default mode of playing now for at least 35 years.

England is in crisis. You have to say that when we have such a small pool of talent to choose from and no end in sight of that reality. You have to say that when we are beaten at home by a second string German side who themselves at not at any kind of peak of form. We need to accept that reality and start realigning our expectations and ambitions accordingly. It’s time for revolution not consolidation. That old ways don’t work for England any more and until we free ourselves from those shackles, we will not make progress.

John Nicholson writes each week for Football 365 and EPL Talk. You can listen to John’s wonderful stories on episode 30 and 45 of the EPL Talk Podcast, as well as purchase his excellent Footy Rocks book and order one of his unique rock’n roll T-shirts.

This entry was posted in General, Leagues: EPL. Bookmark the permalink.

About Christopher Harris

Founder and publisher of World Soccer Talk, Christopher Harris is the managing editor of the site. He has been interviewed by The New York Times, The Guardian and several other publications. Plus he has made appearances on NPR, BBC World, CBC, BBC Five Live, talkSPORT and beIN SPORT. Harris, who has lived in Florida since 1984, has supported Swansea City since 1979. He's also an expert on soccer in South Florida, and got engaged during half-time of a MLS game. Harris launched EPL Talk in 2005, which was rebranded as World Soccer Talk in 2013.
View all posts by Christopher Harris →

6 Responses to England's National Team Is In Crisis

  1. Anonymous says:

    England’s problems go so far beyond McClaren, changing managers would probably further destablize the situation right now and end any chance of Euro qualification.

  2. Simon Burke says:

    to be fair England played very well yesterday – created bags of chances (Owen and Dyer each should have scored) and we were beat on 2 bizarre German goals that happen once every 30 years.
    I have berated McLaren in the past but not for yesterday. We were entertaining, Germany didnt get into our half for the first 22 minutes and we created a lot.

    We had a couple of missed tackles, one freak cross , one long range bomb and we have somehow lost in a game where there about 55 substitutions – in a friendly between 2 under strength teams.
    I am not worried. I was actually entertained for a change watching England.

    Radio 5, Football365 and this muppet are all digging the knife in needlessly.

  3. wakeman says:

    I fully agree with simon burke’s comments. For me the whole feel of the game was much more positive than we’ve been used to. I’m no particular supporter of McClaren’s but I wish pundits were concentrating more on the positives from the game.

    Micah Richards was outstanding, there was fluidity to the passing at times and the players seemed to have a more confident air about them.

    I don’t think last night’s result will do any damage at all, but there are clearly those in the media who would rather see failure and moan about it. The author of the article is using a defeat (not a catastrophic or significant one) to repeat what many ranters have said before.

    And it clearly wasn’t proof read!

  4. tyduffy says:

    Your points about flaws in England’s developmental system are valid. However, I don’t think it possible to blame a dearth or lack of depth of talent is what is weighing them down. Germany was calling up people playing for FC Koln in the 2nd division to fill out a squad for that match.

    They have gifted young players. Rooney and Richards come to mind. They have elite caliber players like Gerrard who would be automatic first choices for every squad in Europe. The problem is forming them into a coherent and competent unit, a task to which McClaren has proved woefully inadequate.

    What top European international squad has looked good? Italy just got beat 3-1 by Hungary with a bunch of geriatrics. France has called up Boumsong in the last year. Spain are perpetually incompetent.

  5. Chad says:

    1. England’s first problem is Mclaren. Nothing against the man, but there is a coach somewhere that could help England shine (Jose!). I think the FA (maybe the fundamental problem) is incompetent, and they pick the wrong candidates.

    2. England’s second problem is the pervasive perception amongst the English that England will screw up, play bad, etc. This affects the psyche of the English players, not only because of current negative expectations by England fans, but also because the players themselves grew up in a culture where England is expected to suck. It’s a self-defeating mentality that the players themselves adopt effecting their play negatively.

    3. England’s third problem is Paul Robinson (their goal keeping situation in general is bleak). Teams that have a strong mentality and who are successful usually have a strong keeper. Robinson gets scored on from deep every other week because he sits too far out of net and he lacks the proper reaction to compensate for his positioning. Also, he’s not anything special on crosses. The players, no matter what they say, realize this. This creates an even worse team morale.

  6. Publius says:

    Not to nitpick, but England doesn’t have a population of 60 million–the whole of the UK, yes, might approach 60 million, but I believe that England’s population is more like 35-40 million. Thus, the talent pool is more limited than it would seem. Imagine if Germany were to field separate teams from Bavaria, Saxony, etc.–they’d probably only have won one World Cup too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>