Photo credit: Mike DiNovo-USA TODAY Sports
It’s been often overlooked that as MLS expands and is adding four new clubs in the next round of expansion, that television market size and media profile might factor heavily into the decision making process. While some markets have established themselves at the lower division level, others that have not might be under strong consideration because MLS needs to have a stronger mix of larger TV markets in its portfolio when its marketing arm SUM negotiates the next TV rights deal that includes the league in the 2021-2022 time period.
By the time the next TV rights is up for bidding, MLS will have expanded from 24 to 28 teams.
It makes business sense for MLS to pursue the top TV markets because the more people who tune in to MLS games on TV, the more money MLS can receive in the future from lucrative TV contracts and sponsorships. MLS is already in the top 10 largest TV markets in the United States. Those top 10 cities are: (1) New York, (2) Los Angeles, (3) Chicago, (4) Philadelphia, (5) Dallas/Fort Worth, (6) San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose, (7) Washington DC, (8) Boston, (9) Atlanta and (10) Houston.
So, in MLS’s decision making process to select the next four cities that the league will expand to, the TV market size is a huge factor. Here is a look at each of the prospective 12 MLS expansion markets (in alphabetical order) and the television profile for each including how large a Hispanic TV market each is.
Charlotte
Nielsen rank – 22 (overall) 36 (Hispanic)
Charlotte’s bid is impaired after the failure of the city to approve a multi-million dollar funding package for a stadium. Charlotte is an attractive market and MLS would like to place a team somewhere in the southeast to create rivalries with Atlanta and DC United. However, Charlotte’s bid does not include the owners of the existing USL club, the Charlotte Independence, and seems to be suffering from an unrealistic expectation of public funding.
Charlotte is a growing TV market with a large corporate community. This one makes a lot of sense for MLS but the time might not be right.
Cincinnati
Nielsen rank – 36 (overall) 92 (Hispanic)
FC Cincinnati averaged the highest attendance per game in 2016 of any US-based club outside MLS. In fact, FCC averaged 17,296 fans per match, a number that would have ranked ahead of several MLS clubs. Still market size is prohibitive for Cincinnati as is geography with Columbus nearby along with fellow expansion-bid city Indianapolis.
It’s difficult to fathom MLS putting a team in this small a TV market. However, few lower division teams have ever gained the level of support as FC Cincinnati.
Detroit
Nielsen rank – 13 (overall) 43 (Hispanic)
Detroit provides the biggest mystery of the MLS expansion sweepstakes. It’s a big market and no doubt a place where MLS wants to be. It also boasts one of the most visibly successful non-professional clubs in the country, supporter-managed fourth division Detroit City FC. DCFC isn’t just another fourth division side, it’s a sensation. And the type of supporters the club has attracted have no interest in joining MLS.
Your assessment of San Diego is dead wrong. Having been born and raised in San Diego, soccer is actually quite popular in the city. One huge factor you didn’t mention is with the Chargers leaving for Los Angeles, MLS can capitalize on this the same way the Sounders did when the Sonics left town. There has always been a huge rivalry between LA and San Diego sports teams and that wouldn’t change with an MLS team. A team in San Diego can easily coexist with the club in TJ. San Diegan’s would easily support both clubs since they are in different leagues and countries. A friendly match or even a match between the two in the Champions League would be huge. San Diego is a big soccer market just waiting to be tapped. Personally, I believe San Diego will be selected as one of the expansion cities.
Might want to check into the developments in Sacto and St Louis….they are practically derailed at this point.
That’s too bad St Louis seems like a no brainer, great amateur soccer structure, big population base with NFL gone too, and MLS needs another midwest team- instant rivalry with KC and Chicago
More anti MLS fake news from Kartik and Chris.
I often do not agree with you but this time you finaly did some reasearch with out your emotions clouding your analysis. You have perdicted the 4 teams exactly how it will unfold. Well done…..
Nice review, and I am always a fan of your work, and that of the larger WST team. One question I would have would be whether the television market size should be existed for the presence of other major league teams with seasons that overlap MLS. I do not know how much elasticity or substitution there is between sports, but I imagine that all else equal a city with, lets say MLB, is less attractive to MLS than its twin city , with no MLB. Is there any evidence of sports market saturation, or is franchise success entirely a question of the MLS team finding its own niche, which is easier the bigger the market? On a related note, I miss the old podcast format, but there is probably a saturation of pundit-driven shows, although I do think there is a need for a strong independent American-oriented podcast. Also, here you have picked Sacramento, St Louis, San Antonio and Tampa Bay as top candidates, but these are not really featured on your previous Top 20 expansion list. Maybe you could revisit that sometime.
“But concerns are abound beginning with the desire to play in St Petersburg rather than Tampa,” > False concern. It is an easy half hour drive from Tampa to St. Pete/Al Lang on weekends. Most MLS games are on weekends. Problems for MLB/Rays in St. Pete, with its frequent midweek games, don’t apply to MLS.
“and the previous failure of MLS in this market.” > Another false concern. Tampa Bay Mutiny had no owner and a super-expensive rent of Raymond James Stadium to deal with. In spite of that, the Mutiny were far from the worst supported MLS team circa 1996-2001. MLS teams were contracted in 2001 for reasons that had nothing to do with average attendance. They were contracted because MLS couldn’t afford the team during a financial crunch and could not find someone to buy the team. MLS f_cked up the Tampa Bay situation in 2001; it was not the fault of the local soccer fans or the market.
“Also, the close proximity to Orlando, one of MLS’ flagship teams might work both ways. MLS does not have two clubs outside two largest cities in the country as close as Orlando City and the Rowdies would be geographically.” > Distance between Orlando and St. Pete is comparable to distance between Cincinnati and Columbus, Sacramento and San Jose, and San Diego and Los Angeles; St. Pete is only a few miles closer to Orlando than the others are to each other. These are all distinct, different markets. Increasing regional close geographic rivalries is definitely a good thing.