SUN, 8:30AM ET
PAL3
LIV1
SUN, 11AM ET
HUL1
TOT1
SUN, 1:30PM ET
RBNY
REVS
SUN, 2:45PM ET
ACM
INT
SUN, 5PM ET
LAG
SEA
MON, 3PM ET
AST
SOU

Assessing Manchester United’s Transfer Dealings

manchester united banner Assessing Manchester United’s Transfer Dealings

Sir Alex Ferguson has nothing left to prove. Everyone knows this. And if reports that suggest he was recently in New York speaking to Pep Guardiola about Manchester United are to be believed, the man himself knows it too. Still, this season has the potential to be one of the man’s finest, with possibly the stiffest challenge he’s ever faced.

Manchester City have had more financial power than United since 2008. As soon as Robinho turned up, Fergie must have known this was coming. A couple of seasons to get the spine of a decent team together and the right manager in place and the blue half of Manchester were title contenders, finishing third behind United and Chelsea. Then of course, after last season they finally had a legitimate claim to be greater than the red half.

Are they? Probably not, United had their excuses last season just like City had theirs the season before. Manchester United had the most days lost to injury in the Premiership, including serious injuries to key players such as Vidic, Nani and Rio Ferdinand. And the title still went to goal difference. This season, with both clubs spending and strengthening, will probably be the decisive one in terms of where footballing power truly lies.

Which makes United’s transfer dealings so much the odder. Five players in, Nick Powell and Angelo Henrique most likely ones for the future both being 18. Two forwards and a 23 year old Dutch left back never capped for his country. Of course United fans, (and people in general), may point out that those two forwards are two of the very best, and indeed they are. (Full disclosure: the author is a Liverpool fan and, despite detesting United, thinks Kagawa is tops.) The question is, did United need them?

Ferguson said that the arrival of Van Persie and Kagawa means that “the title certainly be lost on goal difference again”. The problem with that logic is that Manchester United had 89 points and 28 wins last season, quite the achievement especially with their injury problems. They scored 89 times, second highest in the division, and weren’t just flat track bullies. Eight were put past Arsenal, three past Chelsea and four against Everton. Ferguson quite slyly has seemed to forget that goal difference can also be improved by conceding less. Blackburn, City, Everton, Chelsea and Newcastle all scored three or more against the defending champions.

When fit and on form, Nemanja Vidic and Rio Ferdinand are one of the best central defensive partnerships in the world. Their contrasting styles mean that United are comfortable both playing from the back and defending deep in their own box. However, they’re both in their 30s and Ferdinand especially has been fragile recently. With Ferguson looking to have more of a technical, passing based midfield the center-halves have less protection in front of them and have to be even more solid. This hasn’t been the case. United have conceded in every game they’ve played thus far, and their defensive options look even thinner than last year. Michael Carrick was even pressed into service against Everton and his failure against Felliani has been well-documented. Vidic appears ring-rusty after a long layoff and had an own-goal against Fulham while even the old firm of him and Ferdinand looked weak against Southampton. Neither De Gea nor Lindegaard are top class keepers and the shaky displays in front of them are unlikely to inspire confidence. United’s relatively easy fixture list at the start of the season has meant that these lapses haven’t cost them but fixtures are going to pile up soon and the squad could be exposed.

In fact, when thinking about United the forward line appears to be the area that needs the least work. If a central midfielder or a fullback were bought no eyebrows would have been raised but the side are flush with attacking options, even with the departures of Dimitar Berbatov and Michael Owen.

Ferguson has said before that he rarely lines up in a straight 4-4-2, preferring to have a forward drop off to link midfield and attack, but early this season his side have looked to play in a 4-2-3-1. A clear double pivot in midfield and Kagawa in the hole behind the striker mean that United look quite graceful when they have the ball, but it seems a case of trying to fix something that wasn’t broken.

Perhaps Van Persie was just a big name signing made by the owners to placate a fan base that seems uncomfortable with the direction the club is heading, but Ferguson by all accounts looks pleased to have him. There’s a valid point of view that states if a top player becomes available, a manager should buy him and figure the rest out later. But with the club’s glaring need for cover in the heart of defense, one has to wonder if Manchester United spent their transfer budget in the right way.

This entry was posted in Leagues: EPL, Manchester United. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Assessing Manchester United’s Transfer Dealings

  1. Matthew Jones says:

    Some good points here. Obviously we know money could have been spent elsewhere but there’s no way that Fergie didn’t want RVP. We wanted Baines but £15m+ was deemed too much for Fergie. I’d have loved to see him come to us but I don’t think Evra’s finished and, at 27, Baines would want to be starting every week.

    I don’t buy into the view that RVP’s arrival will stunt Welbeck or Hernandez’s development, they’re only going to learn and improve.

    Obviously the lack of a ball winning centre mid/battler/Keano type midfielder is a key issue for most of us Utd fans but I think that position is becoming more redundant in football anyway, what with the clamping down of sliding tackles etc, plus Cleverley’s good start to the season may justify Fergie’s reluctance to invest in that area.

  2. Faichaimond says:

    Firstly, kudos for writing an article about (probably) your most hated team.

    I would have loved to imagine what could have been if a top class midfielder (ala Moutinho, Sneijder) was bought instead of RvP but after Rooney’s injury (and form) and coupled with RvP’s performances, I can’t really say that I’m not pleased with the way things are going. But honestly Welbeck playing at the wing (definitely not his natural position leaves) Evra too exposed to opposition counter attacks. I feared that Nani, albeit inconsistent, would be sold to Zenit, giving us inadequate cover at the wings, luckily that wasn’t the case.

    For cover in defence, we already have Smalling, Evans and Jones, but their injuries so far have been quite irritating.

    And about the GK part, De Gea might not be as good coming out for crosses, but his performances so far have really kept us in games (we would have been totally blown away by Everton, if not for him).

  3. Todd says:

    Decent article.
    I find it hard to disagree with anything there really.

    I like Carrick and Cleverly I have just felt that so far they have failed to really show they can play together. Both seem to be in there doing the same role of basically passing the ball back and forth but not making any real movement forward.
    Too often Kagawa has looked good, but alone. Same with RvP.

    I think it will take time, but they will eventually get it right.

    As for the back…. you pretty much summed it up. So far every match I have been very nervous every time a team is going forward against them. Southampton looked especially dangerous with both speed and height advantages over United’s back 4 (and sometimes only back 2 with evra and rafael making runs forward).

  4. Dave says:

    Nani’s deal fell apart because of Nani’s wage demands. United and Zenit had agreed a fee but the player could not agree terms with Zenit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>