Connect with us

Leagues: EPL

US Premier League TV deal: FAQ

US Premier League TV deal

We take a deep dive into the US Premier League TV deal to answer all of the questions you have. And to explain what this means for soccer fans in the United States.

Q: What happened to the Premier League rights?

A: After several months of conversations, negotiations and then bidding, NBC Sports has renewed the Premier League rights for the next six seasons. The new deal starts August 2022 and runs through May 2028.

Q: Who has acquired the Spanish-language rights?

A: Univision wanted the rights, but in the end, Telemundo Deportes was able to renew the rights. In response to the news, here’s what President of Telemundo Deportes Ray Warren said:

“[Telemundo Deportes] are extremely proud to have played a key role in the growth of Premier League in the United States these past nine years. We are incredibly excited to continue showcasing the league’s iconic clubs and top players in the world to our Hispanic audience. We look forward to working closely with NBC Sports to continue delivering the highest quality and most authentic Spanish-language coverage of Premier League for the next six seasons.”

The biggest club soccer TV rights deal in U.S. history

Q: What’s so important about NBC Sports and Telemundo Deportes renewing the rights?

A: Two reasons. Firstly, NBC Sports and Telemundo signed their initial deal with the Premier League in 2012 for the 2013/14 through 2015/16 seasons. They then renewed that for 2016/17 through 2021/22. And now have renewed it again, this time for 2022/23 through 2027/28 seasons. In total, that is fifteen years of soccer coverage, which is unheard of in the United States for a deal of that length.

Secondly, it’s reported that NBCUniversal paid almost $2.6 billion for the rights for 2022/23 through 2027/28. That’s approximately $433 million per year to be the exclusive broadcaster in the United States. That blows away all of the competition.

In comparison, NBC Sports paid $250 million for the rights from 2013/14 through 2015/16. When it renewed its deal for 2016/17 through 2021/22, it paid close to $1 billion. NBC Sports did such a good job of broadcasting the Premier League that it had to agree to $2.6 billion to defeat its rivals for the 2022/23 through 2027/28 rights.

The Premier League was able to more than double the amount of money it received in the last deal. That’s incredible.

How does the US Premier League TV deal compare to other leagues? The top-flight U.S. Major League Soccer’s current deal is for $90 million per season. However, $30 million of that deal per year goes to U.S. Soccer because the rights deal includes both the men and women national teams.

Premier League Rights: Most competitive ever

Q: What happened to the CBS Sports-ESPN combined bid, and why didn’t that one win?

A: Together, the media giants are two of the most powerful in U.S. sports. CBS Sports and ESPN worked extremely hard to present a convincing proposal to the Premier League. Initially, both broadcasters wanted the games for streaming (Paramount+ and ESPN+, respectively). But after hearing that the Premier League wanted more games on TV, both broadcasters came back with a stronger proposal. In short, a guaranteed number of games on television plus the remainder on streaming. If agreed, it would have given the Premier League visibility on ABC and CBS throughout the season. Ultimately, while the proposal was a strong one, the proposal from NBC Sports was for more money.

Q: Is it true that FOX Sports bid more for the rights but still lost?

A: According to a report, FOX Sports made a combined offer with WarnerMedia for the rights to the Premier League that was more than what NBC Sports offered.

Among all of the major broadcasters, FOX Sports has the reputation for the worst coverage of the sport. Ultimately, that may have made a big difference in the minds of the Premier League executives who would not have wanted their brand to be associated with FOX Sports.

When it comes to the US Premier League TV deal, image and reputation to grow not hurt the brand is important.

The value of having one major soccer league

Q: Other than money, what did NBCUniversal’s proposal offer that the others didn’t?

A: “We are the network of the Premier League, not the network of soccer,” NBC Sports Group President of Programming Jon Miller said. “We put them on an equal footing with all our properties.

“When we first acquired the rights, they had been split between three partners: ESPN, Fox and Univision. And while those entities did a great job, [the Premier League] wasn’t made a priority.”

Miller added, “The other thing I know that’s important to the Premier League is that our soccer message is not diluted in any way. That if we’re going to promote the sport, that they’re the ones that will be the beneficiary, and we capitalize on that, and we drove that home in every conversation and every kind of marketing pitch and conversation that we had with them. I think it paid off.”

The NBC Sports Difference

Q: How competitive was the bidding process for the Premier League rights?

A: “We knew it was going to be an incredibly competitive process,” Bevacqua said. “We knew we were going to have to be aggressive strategically and financially. For us, it was an all-or-nothing proposition. But we had a nine-year head start, so of course that helped.”

It’s understood that nine different media companies bid on the rights.

Q: So, does this mean more games on TV or streaming for NBC’s coverage of the Premier League?

A: “We have this platform flexibility which sets us well for the future … but absolutely, our intent is to maintain a strong linear presence on NBC and USA,” said NBC Sports Chairman Pete Bevacqua. “I think it’s very important for the Premier League that there was a strong linear presence. That will continue. That’s critical to them. That’s critical to us.”

Miller added, you actually may see an increase in the number of games on NBC.”

Q: How are NBC Sports TV ratings doing currently for the Premier League this season?

A: NBC Sports is averaging a Total Audience Delivery of 609,000 viewers across its English- and Spanish-language Premier League television match windows this season – the highest viewership average through this point in the season since 2015-16 and up 14% from last year.

200+ Channels With Sports & News
  • Starting price: $33/mo. for fubo Latino Package
  • Watch Premier League, World Cup, Euro 2024 & more
  • Includes NBC, USA, FOX, ESPN, CBSSN & more
Live & On Demand TV Streaming
  • Price: $35/mo. for Sling Blue
  • Watch Premier League, World Cup & MLS
  • Includes USA, NBC, FOX, FS1 + more
Many Sports & ESPN Originals
  • Price: $6.99/mo. (or get ESPN+, Hulu & Disney+ for $13.99/mo.)
  • Features Bundesliga, LaLiga, Championship, & more
  • Also includes daily ESPN FC news & highlights show
2,000+ soccer games per year
  • Price: $4.99/mo
  • Features Champions League, Serie A, Europa League & NWSL
  • Includes CBS, Star Trek & CBS Sports HQ
175 Premier League Games & PL TV
  • Starting price: $4.99/mo. for Peacock Premium
  • Watch 175 exclusive EPL games per season
  • Includes Premier League TV channel plus movies, TV shows & more



  1. matt

    January 22, 2022 at 11:47 pm

    Rebecca Lowe grew up with 4 brothers who played, and is a proper fan.
    Kate Abdo is a pretty girl who doesn’t follow the sport at all. It shows.
    Some of the Jocks on Fox mock her for her lack of knowledge.
    She says cringy things back to them, trying to be funny. Ugh. Just awful.

  2. Soccer Watcher

    November 23, 2021 at 12:16 pm

    Thank God the FOX/WarnerMedia didn’t win. Don’t need the unfunny Kate Abdo leading all of the unfunny and non-entertaining attempts at “Haha” on their broadcasts combined with their terrible panels and other subpar talent.

  3. Eddy

    November 22, 2021 at 3:52 pm

    Are we sure that the MLS amount is just $60m? It’s never been determined the exact break down the US Mens and Women get out of the TV deal. I’ve seen numbers they get saying it’s $15-20M but never anything concrete. I do have information in links on the amount MLS receives in Int’l deals and domestic I could share. I only mention asking you were you sure because there was talk about the actual payout amount being a source of contention among some folks as in the USSF itemized annual reports the last few year the amount folks assumed were the TV payout was at was much lower like $15m something. Anyways there’s that.

    How much do you see the next MLS deal being?
    I know its tricky forecasting due to the number of current rights partners MLS has

  4. Cole Stark

    November 20, 2021 at 7:15 pm

    Does this mean espn plus will now focus on Australian a league and Indian super league and work on getting these on schedules? Have aired previous years and now neither are on schedule.

  5. Stevek

    November 20, 2021 at 11:41 am

    “I do hope NBC improves the Peacock experience by adding the ability to rewind the feed”

    Yes, as a longtime Apple TV owner, I can confirm the Peacock app on it is great, you have been able to pause the live feed and rewind for a good while and you are still able to.

  6. rajvosa

    November 20, 2021 at 9:52 am

    This morning, Robbie Earle gave as a simple example why NBC production of EPL is a way above other networks. His VIDEO analysis of the first two Chelsea goals was superb mixture of soccer knowledge and tv technology, something that only CBS has in the best moments of their UCL presentation.

  7. Brendan

    November 20, 2021 at 9:08 am

    Fascinating how it played out in the end .The Premier league executives more interested in having their product visually possible to a bigger audience .And still got more money than previous contracts

  8. Ilya

    November 20, 2021 at 8:18 am

    Tom3 peacock added playback ability to rewind over the year ago. Have you been living under a rock? Get peacock check for yourself before you absurd claims on here.

  9. Ben

    November 19, 2021 at 8:31 pm

    Thank GOD! NBC kept the rights.. now can we get those same day replays back for ALL the games?!!

    Please and THANK YOU!

  10. locofooty

    November 19, 2021 at 4:48 pm

    “When we first acquired the rights, they had been split between three partners: ESPN, Fox and Univision. And while those entities did a great job, [the Premier League] wasn’t made a priority.”

    Univision didn’t have the US rights back then. Anyway, good to see Telemundo keep it. Give me matches in all available windows and stop blocking Telemundo when Peacock gets the marquee Sunday match and we’ll be good.

  11. Tom3

    November 19, 2021 at 11:49 am

    Smart move by the Premier League. ESPN/P+ would do very little other than stream it while NBC puts it on linear television and does promote it. I like streaming things on those other platforms but they put almost no effort outside of having a place on their website with the world feed. I do hope NBC improves the Peacock experience by adding the ability to rewind the feed and putting all of the games in one location and making them available instantly after the games are over. You come to expect that as ESPN+ has that functionality.

  12. trip

    November 19, 2021 at 10:47 am

    It’s a smart move by the Premier League. All they have to do is look at Fox and how it handled the Bundesliga, while Fox may say “it’ll be different this time,” I’m sure the Premier League executives took that, as well has fan sentiment into a Fox broadcast into account.

    And if ESPN and Paramount first bid was to put it all on streaming, that tells you how much effort was really going to go into promoting the Premier League product. Paramount+ does a great job of Champions League, but I see zero outside promotion of it.

    NBC has cultivated a strong Premier League product, they have Men in Blazers, which targets a certain segment of the population, their fanfests that people love. a terrific studio hosts in Rebecca Lowe and a quality broadcast. They have the building blocks and it’s easy to continue to build upon what they have.

  13. greg

    November 19, 2021 at 10:31 am

    @dave – Which is what a number of us were saying all along – that the EPL wouldn’t go only for the highest bidder but was still concerned enough about the league getting priority treatment and not relegated to 2nd tier behind college football or basketball, or NFL, MLB & NBA. And also that to them, a strong linear presence was still important.

  14. Will

    November 19, 2021 at 9:51 am

    Hahaha they know fox is no Bueno lol . Glad they see it how we the fans see it too

  15. dave

    November 19, 2021 at 9:37 am

    Terrific summary, thanks! I find especially interesting:
    * “Initially, both broadcasters wanted the games for streaming (Paramount+ and ESPN+, respectively). But . . . the Premier League wanted more games on TV . . .”
    * ‘“We are the network of the Premier League, not the network of soccer,” NBC Sports Group President of Programming Jon Miller said’
    * ‘Bevacqua said. “We knew we were going to have to be aggressive strategically and financially”‘
    NBC calls their bid “aggressive”, which perhaps tipped the scales compared to a “disciplined” offer from ESPN. The positioning from NBC was smart – you will be our sole soccer priority and an anchor of our sports portfolio; as such, your league will get consistently high visibility on both our linear and streaming platforms

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

More in Leagues: EPL

Translate »