Connect with us

AFP

May backs joint UK-Ireland World Cup bid in 2030


London (AFP) – British Prime Minister Theresa May signalled her “full support” Friday for a potential joint bid by the United Kingdom and Ireland to host the 2030 football World Cup.

May’s comments serve up a formidable challenge to a Latin American plan that Argentina agreed with Paraguay and Uruguay in April.

England’s fans have been riding a wave of patriotic jubilation since their young team beat the odds to reach the semi-finals of the June-July tournament played in Russia.

But the biggest event in the world’s most popular sport is being expanded from 32 to 48 teams starting with the next edition in Qatar in 2022.

The change means that even countries with ample infrastructure may struggle to cope with the weight of pulling off the massively followed competition on their own.

The 2026 tournament was awarded to a “United” bid the United States presented with Mexico and Canada.

The rights for the 2030 World Cup are still up for grabs — and the five Football Associations within the United Kingdom and Ireland have been plotting a joint bid of their own.

May said her support for 2030 stemmed in part from the adulation England received for their performance in Russia.

“Following the excitement of this summer’s World Cup, the English FA are working together with the FAs of Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and Ireland to explore whether there could be a joint bid to host the 2030 World Cup,” May said.

“The decision on whether to bid is, of course, for the Football Associations to make. But if they decide to go forward, they can count on this government’s full support.”

– Record costs –

England’s Russia campaign ended with a 2-1 extra-time loss to Croatia in a game they led until the closing minutes of normal time.

Coach Gareth Southgate thinks the team still have room to grow and should be setting themselves the target of bringing the World Cup trophy home from Qatar.

How any of the teams perform in 2030 is a matter of pure conjecture because nations will have a new generation of stars by that point.

Yet what is certain is that the cost of staging a World Cup will be substantial — and possibly more than any one country can reasonably afford.

Russia is believed to have spent a record $13.5 billion (11.6 billion euros) .

Much of that money went into giving some of the 11 host cities their biggest makeovers since the Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991.

A joint UK-Ireland bid would not have to invest as much in basic infrastructure such stadiums or airports and hotels.

Yet World Cup costs had been rising even before the 48-team expansion and the governing body FIFA is keen to keep the games economically viable for the hosts.

200+ Channels With Sports & News
  • Starting price: $33/mo. for fubo Latino Package
  • Watch Premier League, World Cup, Euro 2024 & more
  • Includes NBC, USA, FOX, ESPN, CBSSN & more
Live & On Demand TV Streaming
  • Price: $35/mo. for Sling Blue
  • Watch Premier League, World Cup & MLS
  • Includes USA, NBC, FOX, FS1 + more
Many Sports & ESPN Originals
  • Price: $6.99/mo. (or get ESPN+, Hulu & Disney+ for $13.99/mo.)
  • Features Bundesliga, LaLiga, Championship, & more
  • Also includes daily ESPN FC news & highlights show
2,000+ soccer games per year
  • Price: $4.99/mo
  • Features Champions League, Serie A, Europa League & NWSL
  • Includes CBS, Star Trek & CBS Sports HQ
175 Premier League Games & PL TV
  • Starting price: $4.99/mo. for Peacock Premium
  • Watch 175 exclusive EPL games per season
  • Includes Premier League TV channel plus movies, TV shows & more

10 Comments

10 Comments

  1. CTBlues

    October 1, 2018 at 1:03 pm

    I think the following venues would host if this bid was picked: Aviva Stadium (Dublin), Celtic Park (Glasgow), Murrayfield (Edinburgh), Ibrox Stadium (Glasgow), Millennium Stadium (Cardiff), Old Trafford (Manchester), Wembley (London), London Stadium, Tottenham Hotspur Stadium (London), New Stamford Bridge (if ever built) (London), Etihad Stadium (Manchester), Anfield (Liverpool), St James’ Park (Newcastle), Stadium of Light (Sunderland), Villa Park (Birmingham), and Casement Park (if it ever gets redeveloped) (Belfast). If the New Stamford Bridge isn’t built or ready by 2030 and a new 40k seater in Northern Ireland isn’t built by 2030 then Emirates Stadium (London) and Hampden Park (Glasgow) replace them.

    • CTBlues

      October 1, 2018 at 1:07 pm

      Remove Ibrox Stadium and replace it with Hillsborough Stadium (Sheffield).

    • CTBlues

      October 1, 2018 at 1:12 pm

      Remove Etihad Stadium and add Elland Road (Leeds) (if redevelopment to 51k seater happens)

    • CTBlues

      October 1, 2018 at 1:14 pm

      Remove London Stadium and add Riverside Stadium (if redeveloped to 42k seater).

  2. Jose

    September 29, 2018 at 7:01 pm

    Or perhaps “a retructuration is needed” thanks a lot for the observation.

  3. Jose

    September 29, 2018 at 12:11 pm

    Qatar is small country and I don’t think that it’s going to be able to make facilities enough to host the actual format of 32 teams nevertheless for 48, logistic,security,and hospitality infrastructure, the tournament itself need a reestructuration, the purpose,and must improve,the quality of everything,that is included in the contract of it,otherways it perhaps,will collapse as a sport tournament.

    • F Pugh

      September 29, 2018 at 1:17 pm

      Reading this made my dizzy.

      • Jon

        September 29, 2018 at 3:39 pm

        That sentence needed a “reestructuration”.

  4. Brendan

    September 28, 2018 at 9:47 pm

    I don’t believe the next World Cup in 2022 will have 48 teams . It will still have the present format of 32 . The 48 team format is in 2026

    • David

      September 29, 2018 at 12:17 am

      There havre been discussions to have 48 teams in Qatar, but it looks like it probably won’t happen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

More in AFP

Translate »