After several years of hard work, grueling traveling schedules and thorough preparations, Asia produced four World Cup qualifiers – Japan, Australia, South Korea and Iran. The fact that none of these four sides picked up a victory in a combined total of 12 matches played between them highlights the decline of soccer in the region. In conjunction to this, Jordan lost their World Cup play-off decider by an aggregate score of 0-5 to Uruguay. Standards are clearly slipping.
So what exactly are the factors for this decline?
1. Lack of competition
It’s necessary to look at the level of competition these teams face. Living in China, it is easy to see why they are failing to find or produce 11 players of sufficient quality in a nation of 1 billion. There is an alarming lack of recreational facilities. The cost of renting a pitch is also sky high. Furthermore, kids spend most of their youths endlessly doing exams and trying to increase their schooling. For those who subscribe to Malcolm Gladwell’s 10,000 hours theory, these two factors greatly diminish the chances of somewhere like China, India or South Korea producing players of a sufficient standard to compete in the World Cup. Simply put, young people have nor the time, money or facilities to get to the required level.
2. Match fixing
The match fixing syndicates have badly damaged the game in Asia. Most of these shadowy figures come from places such as Macau and Singapore. Corruption is ever present in society in Asia as it is in the rest of the world and this has inevitably wormed its way into soccer in the region in the form of match fixing. Again taking China as an example, the culture of not losing “face” is prevalent. Since face has been lost, soccer has lost significant ground to other sports such as basketball.
3. Poor domestic leagues
The standards of the domestic leagues are not good enough and this is intertwined with the poor level of coaching in populous soccer crazy countries such as Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam. The Middle East has some rich soccer history and has produced good players in the past. Iranian soccer suffers severely from sanctions and has resorted to playing ultra defensive soccer that will not get them very far in the long run.
Similarly in the Far East and Australia, the domestic leagues have serious problems and there is a lack of quality. Guangzhou Evergrande are the champions of Asia, but the rely mainly on a Brazilian named Elkeson to score the goals, who was nowhere near the Brazil set up even if Fred and Jo are there main strikers. In addition to this, Guangzhou coach Marcello Lippi has claimed his South Korean centre half Kim, is “good enough to play for Manchester United”. Not on the evidence of this World Cup, particularly the Algeria match. The competition is just not good enough – the reasons being outlined above.
4. Too few footballers play abroad
The U.A.E. played some outstanding football in the 2012 Olympics. However, none of these players moved on from the Middle East because the finance on offer is astronomical to the best players. Omar Abdulrahman, who was outstanding in the tournament and had trials with Man City, is still playing in the domestic league with Al Ain two years later. The foreign imports in this region are on eye-watering salaries that are killing the league. Paradoxically, the money on offer stops the best homegrown players from leaving and testing themselves elsewhere. Take Yaya Toure for example. He has played in Cote D’ Ivoire, Belgium, Ukraine, France, Spain and England. The access to so many different styles of soccer can only benefit players.
5. Android football
Which brings us to the enigma that is Japan. Japan have been the best team in Asia for some time now. They seem to have a good youth system. There is minimal match fixing (if any) and they have a soccer-hungry public. The JFA seem to be a well run organization and they have players plying their trade at several glamorous European clubs like Inter Milan, Manchester Utd and AC Milan. They also had an experienced coach in Alberto Zaccheroni. So what went wrong you say?
Well up until about 9 months ago I would not have been able to answer the question. Then one day I read that the teams from the Far East play what is termed as “android football”. I had no idea what the term was meant to denote. However, it slowly began to dawn on me, particularly after playing against several Far East Asian players in 5-a-side games, 7-a-sides and 11-asides myself. There was one week in particular when we played a Japanese team at the local park whose manager was also present. They were far better than our rag-ball team of Europeans – fitter, sharper, better technically. In the end, we only lost 4-3 when it should have been about 8-0. They played a type of soccer, “android football,” that I had never encountered before.
“Android football” features set moves from every part of the pitch for every situation – nothing was tried off the cuff. The forwards would receive the ball with their back to goal with space to turn – either to shoot or run at the defence. They would never notice this and always knock it back to the midfielder who would hit a sideways pass and we could regroup and get behind the ball. There was a distinct lack of decision-making – they were doing everything on autopilot. There was no directness. The problem with “android football” is that when something goes wrong – e.g. the opposition win the ball back where they were unexpected to do so or win the first header – it means that they are unprepared and unable to cope with this new scenario. Call it a “glitch” if you like. It is simply not possible to plan for every situation in soccer.
This is exactly what happened to Japan in the World Cup. Ivory Coast scored two identical goals within two minutes of each other. This would not happen to any other team. Against Greece, the “android football” team could not score versus 10 men, and had no plan B. Twice in two games, Japan made the same mistake defensively and the same mistake offensively by repeating unhelpful patterns. Against Colombia, they were simply blown away against a great side.
After the poor form by the Asian teams in World Cup 2014, there’s no doubt that Asian soccer has some massive challenges to tackle in the coming years to avoid the same fate at the World Cup in Russia 2018.
200+ Channels With Sports & News
- Starting price: $33/mo. for fubo Latino Package
- Watch Premier League, World Cup, Euro 2024 & more
Live & On Demand TV Streaming
- Price: $35/mo. for Sling Blue
- Watch Premier League, World Cup & MLS
Many Sports & ESPN Originals
- Price: $9.99/mo. (or get ESPN+, Hulu & Disney+ for $13.99/mo.)
- Features Bundesliga, LaLiga, Championship, & more
2,000+ soccer games per year
- Price: $4.99/mo
- Features Champions League, Serie A, Europa League & NWSL
175 Premier League Games & PL TV
- Starting price: $4.99/mo. for Peacock Premium
- Watch 175 exclusive EPL games per season
110+ channels, live & on-demand
- Price: $59.95/mo. for Plus Package
- Includes FOX, FS1, ESPN, TUDN & more
- Where to find Leicester City vs. Nottingham Forest on US TV
- Will FOX broadcast the World Cup in 4K?
- Where to find Chicago Red Stars vs. Angel City FC on US TV
- Where to find Portland Timbers vs. LAFC on US TV
- Where to find Man City vs. Man United on US TV
- FOX Sports to feature US Soccer float in Macy’s Parade
- FOX says US-England could rank in top 5 biggest games ever
- Umbro’s USA away kit better than Nike’s World Cup effort
- Man City vs Man United: TV coverage details
- Potter magic seals first league win as Chelsea boss