Connect with us


Politicians Move to Bring Back Standing In Stadiums

Over 100 members of Parliament in the UK have signed a motion to urge the British government to re-examine the case for the introduction of safe standing areas at football grounds across Britain.

The measure is also supported by David Cameron (see video), the Conservative leader who is Tony Blair’s main opposition.

Not to be confused with open terracing, the motion recommends that fans be allowed to stand next to their seats in small areas of the ground. If you watched the Liverpool against Everton match from Saturday, you may have heard the PA announcer asking fans to sit down. This has been pervasive throughout the Premiership where fans have reportedly been ejected for standing instead of seating.

As well as creating a louder atmosphere, proponents of the safe standing areas argue that it’s better for football fans who prefer to sit. For example, right now if sections of the crowd decide to stand, the people behind them – who prefer to sit – can’t see the match.

The system is being modeled after Bundesliga, which has embraced seating but has allowed fans to stand in certain sections. See the above picture at Werder Bremen for an example of how the stadium is built to allow for safe standing.

The other argument in favor of safe standing is that ticket prices in these areas would be reduced allowing the working class to be able to afford to go to matches.

While I agree with the motion, I don’t see it passing. Premiership clubs would not be in favor of reducing ticket prices (it’s amazing how quiet the clubs have been since Blackburn came out strongly in favor of reduced prices). I also believe the Premiership clubs would prevent safe standing from happening because they feel that more policing and stewards would be necessary if fans became unruly. Let’s hope my predictions are wrong.

More information about the campaign can be found here and here. And if you agree with the safe standing motion, sign the petition.
200+ Channels With Sports & News
  • Starting price: $33/mo. for fubo Latino Package
  • Watch Premier League, World Cup, Euro 2024 & more
  • Includes NBC, USA, FOX, ESPN, CBSSN & more
Live & On Demand TV Streaming
  • Price: $69.99/mo. for Entertainment package
  • Watch World Cup, Euro 2024 & MLS
  • Includes ESPN, ESPN2, FS1 + local channels
Many Sports & ESPN Originals
  • Price: $6.99/mo. (or get ESPN+, Hulu & Disney+ for $13.99/mo.)
  • Features Bundesliga, LaLiga, Championship, & more
  • Also includes daily ESPN FC news & highlights show
2,000+ soccer games per year
  • Price: $4.99/mo
  • Features Champions League, Serie A, Europa League & NWSL
  • Includes CBS, Star Trek & CBS Sports HQ
175 Premier League Games & PL TV
  • Starting price: $4.99/mo. for Peacock Premium
  • Watch 175 exclusive EPL games per season
  • Includes Premier League TV channel plus movies, TV shows & more


  1. Matthew

    November 28, 2010 at 11:34 pm

    However close we come to passing this, some group of grieving parents from some stadium disaster of generations gone by will come wading in and put a stop to it. It’s like, “sorry you lost your kid, love, but please stop interfering in the lives of others as a coping strategy”. Sounds cold, yes, but sod it…they are one of the biggest obstacles to this sensible law change.

  2. Anonymous

    February 6, 2007 at 10:32 am

    would this move really make a louder atmosphere…maybe

    what would definitely make a louder atmosphere? reduced ticket prices!

  3. Smudger

    February 6, 2007 at 9:24 am

    I just have a hard time believing that this will pass. There is too much liability for the clubs and the FA, as well as the necessity of clubs to make cosmetic changes to their stadiums. I do respect the fact that the politicians have re-visited a very controversial topic. Can the same be said about the Italians?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

More in General

Translate »