SAT, 7AM ET
WED
NOT
SAT, 7:45AM ET
BUR
MUFC
SAT, 9:45AM ET
FUL
CAR
SAT, 10AM ET
MCFC
STO
SAT, 10AM ET
NEW
CRY
SAT, 10AM ET
QPR
SUN

Skyfall (EPL Talk Podcast)

Lot’s of discussion on this week’s podcast. International talk, stats on winning the league and news of Twitter which no one wants to hear about. Could you be more excited? I know…so whilst they squark about Twitter why don’t you express your opinion on some of this week’s issues?

Discussion and percussion as the pod bash around about Michael Owen again; Cuba escapes; and cheering at a game. Speaking of cheering, what do you think of cheering at grounds? Does it change when a team gets more successful? Let the podcast know:

EPL Talk: @epltalk

Kartik: @kkfla737

Kristan: @kheneage

Matt: @mattcrduncan

Morgan: @Morgan_Green

Laurence: @lozcast

Here are the different ways you can listen to the EPL Talk Podcast each day:

  1. Listen via the Flash player included on the website via EPL Talk, or visit the EPL Talk Podcasts page
  2. Subscribe to the EPL Talk Podcast on iTunes,
  3. Add the EPL Talk Podcast RSS feed to your RSS reader,
  4. Buy the EPL Talk Podcast iPhone App which is automatically updated when each new episode is released,
  5. If you have an Android smartphone, buy the EPL Talk Podcast Android App,
  6. Get the free version of the EPL Talk iPhone App which includes the podcasts as well as EPL Talk posts, comments and more, and
  7. Subscribe to the EPL Talk Podcast on the Zune.
Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Skyfall (EPL Talk Podcast)

  1. dano328 says:

    Morgan tonight said “Arsenal & West Hamm are eliminated” This comment makes little since. While I don’t believe Arsenal will win the league, they will play a role. And why mention West Ham in the same sentence? No one has ever contemplated they will win the league. It’s pretty early to say Arsenal have no chance. In what instance besides Koscielny’ s bad game has Arsenal looked less than pretty solid. The didn’t score against two “park the bus” sides and many are saying AFC still playing he best right now. To say they are “eliminated” is absurd.

  2. Morgan says:

    Hey Dano,

    My apologies for not getting a chance to explain on the pod. The reasons are that the lowest position in the table the eventual champions have ever comeback from at this point was 8th (hence West Ham) and the most points a team has ever been behind at this point and gone on to win the title is 6 (hence Arsenal being just behind that cut off) I was using them more as the elimination cut off rather than just those two are done and the other 18 can still get the title. It was just a play on the stats. Not a slight at Arsenal.

  3. dano328 says:

    That makes more sense. Guess the pod did move on too quick after that comment.

    Since following you I’ve notice how you have maintained strong interest in all the American sports as well. Interlude are the only weekends I catch up.

    Thanks for clarifying the point.

  4. Caspar Neickel says:

    WHY OH WHY are we subjected to such poor English grammar week after week? I stopped downloading the podcast for a week or two after various crimes against syntax, and then thought, it can’t really have been that bad! I’ll go back. And then I get this, in a discussion of high-flying Germany:

    “But you look at the dearth of attacking talent that they have . . .”

    When of course the intended meaning was EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE:

    “But you look at the surplus of attacking talent that they have . . .”

    I just don’t understand what the podcast gains from the murder of the English language, inexorably, slowly, bloodily, painfully, show after show, care of our friend Morgan. Please have mercy on our grammatical souls. Avoid cliches. Follow the rules of pronoun and antecedent, subject and predicate, master your idioms, don’t be an idiot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>