THURS, 1PM ET
LIL0
EVE0
THURS, 1PM ET
LIE0
SEV0
THURS, 3PM ET
TOT5
TRI1
THURS, 3PM ET
INT0
ETI0
THURS, 3PM ET
VIL4
ZUR1
THURS, 3PM ET
MON5
APO0

It’s Time For Change At Arsenal This Summer

1356740257 f057fe607b o Its Time For Change At Arsenal This Summer

As the Gunners scrape toward another fourth place finish in the Premier League, both fans and the media are embroiled in the annual debates about the future of Arsenal. The failings of seasons past now have a familiar rhythm to them, though the scale and manner of multiple humbling defeats at the hands of title rivals has ratcheted tensions inside the Emirates to almost unbearable levels.

Against this backdrop, while fingers are pointed and scapegoats readied, the summer window is not coming soon enough for some fans. With it another opportunity to attempt to inject a reliable, competitive edge into the side. Though undoubtedly transfers in and out will and should be made, it could be helpful to take time to revisit and reflect on one of the key components of Arsene Wenger’s period of sustained success that is missing from this Arsenal.

That crucial element was in attendance at Goodison Park to see Everton play Arsenal off the pitch with a version of the style Wenger brought to the Premier League. The cameras cut to David Dein and one has to wonder what Dein thought of the situation his friend and former partner is in. He brought Wenger to England to be a football manager and in that capacity Wenger exceeded all expectations. However since 2007 Wenger has had to shoulder more responsibility than he likely ever expected or wanted.

Though some still regard Dein with dubious suspicion, it cannot be denied that in his time as vice-chairman at Arsenal he provided the perfect counterpart to Arsene Wenger. One of the few in the game whose knowledge of players and staff could go toe-to-toe with Wenger’s, Dein also possessed a business acumen both ruthless and visionary, a vital combination for the idiosyncratic and insular world of football boardrooms.

In the seasons since Dein’s departure and the club embarking on the construction of Emirates Stadium, it was easier to explain the way Arsenal and Arsene acted in the transfer market as mere shrewdness, a temporary tightening of the belt with promises of a grander future for all the faithful. We have arrived at the promised future but the previous summer’s business as well as the 13/14 January window were a ominous sign that the inertia of the spendthrift era could continue unjustified.

Prior to the purchase of Mesut Ozil’s services, the summer window saw an almost-complete deal for Gonzalo Higuain fall apart when news of potential release clauses in Luis Suarez’s contract resulted in the farcical offer of £40,000,001. That both deals could not be kept quiet and negotiated simultaneously is unfortunate but part of the summer circus.  No one at Arsenal seemed to have the will to test Liverpool’s resolve to keep Suarez. There was no last ditch attempt to get Higuain to reconsider his options between Naples and North London. Though Ozil’s talent is undeniable it must be noted that Arsenal did not have to beat any competing offers from rivals to capture their record signing. Obviously this can’t all be laid at Wenger’s feet. The questionable qualities of Ivan Gazidis and Dick Law play their part, but neither strikes me as the type to challenge or offer an alternative to a course of action set by Wenger.

We can all rattle off the names of great managers but most thoughtful followers of soccer would admit that really almost all great managers were double acts. Clough and Taylor, Allison and Mercer, Shankly and Paisley. I believe that if Arsene Wenger remains in his post he needs to overcome his legendary stubbornness and bring in a director of football (Dein himself would be ideal) and elevate Steve Bould to more than just a sympathetic observer.

Arsene Wenger still has the traits and desire to be an elite manager but needs to be allowed (or forced) to refocus his efforts solely on the quality and training of the squad.

This entry was posted in Arsenal, Leagues: EPL. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to It’s Time For Change At Arsenal This Summer

  1. insert name here says:

    I hope Wenger steps down. I think the abuse some fans give him is disgraceful. He may be stubborn and have plenty of faults but over the years he has done fantastic for them on a smaller transfer budget than most of the other clubs above and just below him. Its no coincidence that he stopped winning trophies when all the billionaires came to the PL. Wengers managed a club that financially has been run properly and kept the club in CL places while funding a new stadium & theyll be a very strong club in the future because of it. Thats not to say he doesnt deserve criticism – he does – but the level of vitriol and abuse some so called fans are giving him this season is disgraceful & it looks like it has shocked him. They should show him more respect. I hope he steps down and that David Moyes takes over and has the same yearly Transfer funds as Wenger has had up till 2012 … Thats all those fans (& Piers Morgan) deserve.

  2. Cody (#2) says:

    Jackson,
    A few questions regarding your article…
    1. Why do you think the Suarez offer was farcical? John W Henry came out in the press and admitted that Arsenal had met his buy-out clause & that they had chosen to default on Suarez’s contract obligations. Arsenal left it up to Suarez to pursue the legal remedy, which he decided not to do. Obviously, he didn’t want to make the move. Not sure what is so farcical about that.

    2. If Arsenal were hovering around 2nd place, rather than 4th, and win the FA cup, would you still say he has to go? What results this season would make you think he should stay? just curious.

    • yespage says:

      Agreed. Liverpool weren’t letting go of Suarez for any price. Not certain how that falls on Wenger, other than they shouldn’t have bothered at all.

    • Jackson Culley says:

      Cody,

      1.There’s not overpaying for a player and then there’s offering £1 over the release clause. With hindsight I find it funny but to me it seemed like an example of wanting to do the bare minimum to try and secure a player. There was no attempt to come with a new counter offer. Henry and Rodgers gambled and it paid off, Arsenal took the easier route and got a fantastic player they didn’t need.

      2. No one seems to notice that I never said I want Wenger gone at any point in the article. Of currently available managers I don’t believe there is anyone of the quality required to replace him. As I wrote, I believe he needs to take a step back and delegate more responsibility for the club to others. A lack of quality executives makes that difficult. I think he’s already got a great assistant manager in Steve Bould, though the extent to which Bould is allowed to directly effect aspects of training and tactics is still unknown.

      Fingers crossed for the FA Cup.

  3. yespage says:

    Perpetual Champions League, were in the running for the title this year, but had significant injury problems.

    Who is Arsenal going to sign that will do better than Wenger with the money available? It seems some people have unfair expectations. Arsenal are very competitive, will likely win the FA Cup this season.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>