THURS, 1PM ET
LIL0
EVE0
THURS, 1PM ET
LIE0
SEV0
THURS, 3PM ET
TOT5
TRI1
THURS, 3PM ET
INT0
ETI0
THURS, 3PM ET
VIL4
ZUR1
THURS, 3PM ET
MON5
APO0

Reviewing Premier League Refereeing Decisions: Gameweek 33

epl referee decisions Reviewing Premier League Refereeing Decisions: Gameweek 33

There were three major talking points from Liverpool’s 2-1 win over West Ham at Upton Park. Referee Anthony Taylor was kept very busy all afternoon and didn’t have a great game in my opinion. Here’s why. The first controversy was when he awarded a penalty to Liverpool after James Tomkins was judged to have prevented the ball going past him, after Luis Suarez touched the ball to the side of the defender. Taylor got this call correct.

However, he called the following two major incidents incorrectly. West Ham equalized just before half time, but only after Simon Mignolet was fouled by Andy Carroll, leading to the ball being spilt. Guy Demel put the ball in the net, but the assistant raised his flag. Taylor ran over to him, waving furious Liverpool players away. Taylor had given the goal before spotting the flag, but overruled his assistant and gave the goal. This was a mistake by the referee and when he reviews it, he will be disappointed especially because Carroll fouled Mignolet twice, on the head and the arm.

Liverpool were awarded a second penalty when Adrian was penalized for a foul on Jon Flanagan. The young full back pushed the ball past the keeper but Adrian did get a hand on the ball. Flanagan went down and the penalty was given, much to the surprise of Sky Sports commentator Gary Neville and most of the fans in the ground.

Overall, it was a bad day at the office for Taylor, who is still relatively inexperienced at Premier League level, but I am sure that with time, he will improve and learn from his mistakes. After all, it’s a high pressure job especially with all the money involved in professional soccer nowadays.

david silva Reviewing Premier League Refereeing Decisions: Gameweek 33

Manchester City put pressure on their title rivals by securing three points against Southampton. City won the game 4-1 but the game was far from without incident. In the second minute, Jose Fonte brought down Edin Dzeko in the penalty area with a rather hopeful flailing leg, in a desperate attempt to take the ball. Fonte’s leg connected with Dzeko and the Bosnian had no hesitation in going down. Referee Chris Foy called the decision correctly and pointed straight to the spot.

Southampton were awarded a penalty themselves later in the first half after a superb run from Jack Cork led to him being brought down by Pablo Zabaleta. It was a poor piece of defending from the Argentinian, who is an experienced player, so I think he would have been disappointed when he reviews the incident.

Yaya Toure was booked for simulation, when trying to win a penalty and this was a great spot from Foy, who was in a perfect position to see Toure just fall to the ground. The Ivorian knew instantly that he had been caught and the yellow card was brandished.

The most controversial decision during the match was the decision to award City their second goal after a clear offside was not spotted by the referee’s assistant. Dzeko flicked the ball past the Southampton defense to David Silva, who was offside by a wide margin. I can only think that the linesman missed the touch from Dzeko and thought that the ball had come straight through from the previous pass. This could have been resolved if the referee had communicated with his assistant and told him that there was a touch. The assistant could have then raised his flag and resolved the incident.

Chelsea’s Mohamed Salah was clumsily brought down by Andy Wilkinson in the area, during the Blues’ 3-0 win against Stoke City. The penalty was an easy decision for referee Lee Probert to make. Frank Lampard converted the goal at the second attempt after Asmir Begovic‘s save came straight back to Lampard, who scored his 250th goal for Chelsea.

holtby goal line technology Reviewing Premier League Refereeing Decisions: Gameweek 33

Fulham’s Lewis Holtby was very unfortunate not to be on the scoresheet on Saturday in their much-needed 2-1 victory over Aston Villa. Brad Guzan was  beaten in the Villa goal but Matt Lowton was on the line to prevent the goal being scored. A decision that would have been nearly impossible to call without the goal-line technology system, which has been proven to be a superb investment once again. The virtual analysis showed that the ball did not cross the line, but was unbelievably close.

This entry was posted in Leagues: EPL, Premier League Referee Decisions. Bookmark the permalink.

About Andy Turnbull

Hi, I am Andy Turnbull from the UK. I am 19 years of age and a football enthusiast. I will be covering a range of subjects, specialising in key refereeing decisions from the Premier League. I am a referee myself at amateur level, so I hope you enjoy my articles. Follow me on twitter @AJT_1994.
View all posts by Andy Turnbull →

8 Responses to Reviewing Premier League Refereeing Decisions: Gameweek 33

  1. Martin J. says:

    According to Glen Hoddle and Graham Poll (former referee) the only decision the referee in the West Ham-Liverpool game got wrong was allowing the West Ham goal. They both feel that the two penalties awarded to Liverpool were the right decisions. For Liverpool’s second penalty, the keeper did get the ball first but then reached out and made contact with Flannagan’s leg which is why it was a penalty.

    City’s second goal against Southampton was the worst decision of the weekend. That was blatantly offside.

    • Andy Turnbull says:

      For me, Flanagan is looking for the pen. He knew once adrian got a hand to it that the ball was gone. He just fell over in my view.

      • Brn442 says:

        Fair point about Flannigan, or any layer these days, looking for a penalty but after the pic below?

        https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=640552452681865&set=a.409410585796054.92690.128845747185874&type=1

        Not so sure.

      • yespage says:

        Why would you look for a penalty, when the ball is within reach and you have a wide open net, and the goalie behind you.

        Adrian was not able to get the ball out of Flanagan’s reach, and his body was the reason why Flanagan didn’t get a chance at a goal. Typically, players dive once the ball is out of reach.

      • Andy Turnbull says:

        Players are always looking for penalties in the box. It would have been an incredibly tight angle to score from, so I think Flanagan went down as soon as he knew it was very difficult to score, or create a chance.

        Adrian does touch his leg as the pic shows, but that is more likely to be from momentum after touching the ball, opposed to a foul with no contact made on the ball.

      • Aaron says:

        Nonsense. Flanagan continued to the ball even after he hit the turf and didn’t even make a gesture to the referee – just kept on playing. While Adrian did graze the ball, replays show pretty clearly that his left hand rather unnecessarily grabbed at Flanagan’s leg. For me it was the afters, not the initial contact with the ball (which was VERY slight) that led to the penalty.

  2. Jimmy Rustle says:

    Goal line tech really is harsh but rules are rules I guess.

    • Andy Turnbull says:

      see your point, but everyone has got what they want with the GDS. Its a yes or no answer. Ball not in = no goal. Great to see that it’s been a success so far.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>