WED, 2:45PM ET
LIV
REAL
WED, 2:45PM ET
AND
ARS
WED, 2:45PM ET
OLY
JUV
WED, 2:45PM ET
GAL
BVB
WED, 2:45PM ET
ATL
MAL
WED, 2:45PM ET
LEV
ZEN

Against Different Opposition, Chelsea’s Tactic of Playing Without a Striker Will Work

chelsea starting XI Against Different Opposition, Chelseas Tactic of Playing Without a Striker Will Work

In Chelsea’s 3-1 loss to Paris Saint-Germain on Wednesday in the first leg of the UEFA Champions League quarterfinals, Jose Mourinho set up his Blues side without a recognizable striker in the starting XI. This tactic, while unconventional, worked for 55 minutes to maintain some possession and create occasional scoring opportunities on the counter-attack.

With Chelsea facing a critical set of fixtures upcoming culminating with an April 27th trip to Anfield to face high-flying Liverpool, setting up this way might not be a bad idea going forward.

The Blues strike force has been woeful this season. Thus in a critical Champions League tie, Mourinho turned to André Schürrle to try and stimulate the attack. It was obvious from early in the match the German International was not making the types of forward runs strikers make but yet was getting his feet on the ball often and tucking in nicely when Chelsea were playing defensively.

Postmatch, Mourinho described Schürrle’s performance:

“With Andre, at least I know we have one more player to have the ball, we have one more player to associate with the other players. Even not being dangerous because he is not a striker, he can associate and the team can have control of the ball possession like we had.”

In minute 55, Mourinho made the decision to play with a striker, Fernando Torres who replaced Schürrle. In the postmatch interview the Chelsea Manager’s body language made it clear Torres had failed and that the substitution was an error. His quote was diplomatic but his body language was not:

“I change with 1-1 because I thought Fernando could give us more depth than Andre. With Andre, the team had good control and possession — he was dropping deep. I thought Fernando could give us a bit more.”

Going forward it is entirely possible when Samuel Eto’o is worn down or unavailable that Mourinho will simply play without a striker. Chelsea was holding its own away from home against arguably one of the top 3 teams on the planet before Torres came on. Schürrle’s performance and link-up play with the rest of the team could provide a template for how the Blues seek to play at Anfield in a match that could very well decide the Premier League title.

For more Chelsea news, analysis and opinion, visit the Chelsea team page.

This entry was posted in Chelsea, Leagues: EPL. Bookmark the permalink.

About Kartik Krishnaiyer

A lifelong lover of soccer, the beautiful game, he served from January 2010 until May 2013 as the Director of Communications and Public Relations for the North American Soccer League (NASL). Raised on the Fort Lauderdale Strikers of the old NASL, Krishnaiyer previously hosted the American Soccer Show on the Champions Soccer Radio Network, the Major League Soccer Talk podcast and the EPL Talk Podcast. His soccer writing has been featured by several media outlets including The Guardian and The Telegraph. He is the author of the book Blue With Envy about Manchester City FC.
View all posts by Kartik Krishnaiyer →

3 Responses to Against Different Opposition, Chelsea’s Tactic of Playing Without a Striker Will Work

  1. Iancransonsknees says:

    Sunderland didn’t realise it until it was too late but they were playing the same tactic by naming Joy Altidore in their team, thus proving it doesn’t work against most teams.

  2. Iancransonsknees says:

    Jozy (bloody predeictive text).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>