Luis Suarez does things that no other attacking player in the world does. All of the discussion about who is better, Ronaldo or Messi, deserves to have Suarez included in the conversation. But that Suarez plays at a club that hasn’t featured in Champions League since the 2009-10 season and because of his own self-inflicted bad boy image (as contrasted with the carefully crafted Messi persona), he isn’t getting the mentions in the discussion he deserves. But Suarez’s goal scoring rate and rate of quality goals is currently second to none globally. Ibra hasn’t scored the sheer volume of spectacular goals and Messi has not been involved in spectacular team moves that Suarez has been a part of since returning from his most recent long-term suspension.
Based on the reactions to Manuel Pellegrini’s mathematical prowess midweek in Munich, you would think Manchester City had lost that match. But what in fact happened was that the Blues rallied from a two goal deficit at the home of the European Champions and won a match. This came days after dropping points to a Southampton side that was missing several key performers. The potential impact of the Bayern result cannot be over-stated. Much of the Citizens woes away from home have been due to concentration lapses, lack of fight, poor tactical planning and coping with playing on narrower pitches. While the later problem wasn’t solved in the Bayern victory, the first three points were remarkably corrected in one 90 minute evening of soccer. While this does not mean City are over the away sluggishness just yet, the signs are that the side has moved forward and is beginning to gel.
Meanwhile, Manchester City’s Fernandinho is in my opinion is redefining how the holding midfield position is played in English football.
In the match between Manchester City and Arsenal, Kieran Gibbs’ absence was perhaps the single biggest factor in the game. Nacho Monreal’s performance was nothing short of a shocking and it must pose question for Arsene Wenger as to whether he needs more full back cover (or perhaps needs to try using Carl Jenkinson at left back when Gibbs is unavailable.)
After several years of existence as the prototypical yo-yo club, West Brom has stabilized as a Premier League club. Yet the board has not released enough cash to guarantee continued Premier League status. Steve Clarke found himself working on an extremely tight budget and dependent largely on loan players to make an impact. As one of the best tacticians in British football, Clarke won’t be out of work for long (maybe he returns to Chelsea to work with Jose Mourinho) and the Baggies are sure to rue the error in judgment demonstrated by sacking him. Then again perhaps the goal for West Brom’s board is to go down without spending much money and collect parachute payments while trying to come right back up. It’s a formula they once perfected and conceivably could be aiming to replicate again?