FIFA Confederations Cup Should Always Be Held in Footballing Nations

8474376288 79c885ea5d 300x199 FIFA Confederations Cup Should Always Be Held in Footballing Nations

FIFA’s Confederations Cup has demonstrated precisely why major international tournaments should be held in football crazy nations. The crowds in Brazil for this tournament which has previously been viewed by many a pundit as glorified friendlies has helped give the tournament a feel that was missing in many of the previous editions of this tournament.

An attempt has been made to make this event relevant to the masses of football fans across the planet. For the first time in recent memory the UK media is actively engaged in covering the tournament. In 2009, every match was on in the United States but the coverage is enhanced this go-round which compliments the general growth of the game in the nation over the past four years. When the United States beat Germany in the 1999 Confederations Cup, I had to follow the game via text commentary and months later got to properly see the match. Such was the anonymity and identity crisis this tournament suffered back in the day.

In 2009, the tournament got lots of hype in the United States especially following the USA’s 2-0 shock semifinal win over Spain, but the context of the victory to this day remains missing. Was it a meaningful victory, a blip on Spain’s otherwise flawless record over the past six years or simply an American win in a glorified friendly after the USA had struggled to get out of the Group Stage?

Italy’s 4-3 victory over Japan yesterday where the Japanese did everything but get a result was arguably the greatest match in the history of this tournament. The riveting drama had the feel of a World Cup knockout stage match largely because of the contribution of the Brazilian crowd. Japan, a side I personally rate highly and have stated previously would be the best non-European or South American side at World Cup 2014 won lots of supporters over even if they were eliminated from the tournament yesterday.

The Azzuri who should be a genuine contender to win World Cup 2014 will benefit from the “walk-through” aspects of the Confederations Cup as they prepare for next summer’s big show. But this tournament has me thinking that in the future the Confederations Cup should be held in separate locations from the World Cup to generate energy and enthusiasm during the actual event.

FIFA has labored to make this event relevant to the world of football. The best way to do so would be to rotate this tournament among footballing nations and not take it to Qatar for instance in 2021. It for example could be a major tournament brought to England before the next round of bids for the World Cup (2026 and 2030) is received and determined.  FIFA should strongly consider de-linking this event from World Cup hosting and allow it to breathe on its own.

This entry was posted in Confederations Cup. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to FIFA Confederations Cup Should Always Be Held in Footballing Nations

  1. Marc says:

    I want my Club football back.

  2. ben says:

    Problem is that FIFA views this tournament solely as a dry run for the World Cup host to make sure the host country/infrastructure/etc are ready.

    I think the point is that the World Cup itself needs to be brought back to true footballing countries (I’d include the US there) as opposed to being sent off to remote outposts to try to “spread” the game (read: allow fifa execs to be bribed handsomely).

  3. Huw Roma says:

    I miss the days of the old World Cups and tournaments with their rough look and sounds. Where you’d expect a WC in Brazil to have the feel of a Mexico 86, it instead looks like a typical European setting with all the new and upgraded stadiums. I know those days are gone, but the whole things seems to have no heart.

  4. Pakapala says:

    The case you are making: de-linking the tournament to the World Cup is exactly what this tournament was before and it didn’t catch interest until it was marketed as part of the WC host nation’s prelude to the World Cup. So you want the tournament to take steps back by doing the complete opposite of what has made it grow in interest. South Africa gathered more interest than the one in Germany and so on. I don’t think the host nation being a big footballing nation per se plays a role in how much interest people pays to it

  5. Steven P. says:

    One reason the Confederations Cup is now gaining a following is because it is now held at the same venue as the World Cup. reporters from nations not in the tournament are going to Brazil, as they did last time to South Africa, to get a feel for the place.

    It doesn’t hurt that it is in a country where soccer is a religion and the host nation is in the tournament. If this where being held in Korea I’m sure it would get the same kind of support from locals there.

  6. rory says:

    That FIFA world club thing would probably benefit from a move too. Might do well in North or South America

  7. Andre says:

    Breaking the link between the Confed Cup and the World Cup the following summer would hurt not help the tournament.

    I am not a fan of putting a World Cup in Qatar but that’s a different issue.

    • Sammy says:

      The next Confederations Cup will be in Qatar and because of all the questions about Qatar I believe it will be even more watched than this one in Brazil.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>