WED, 2:45PM ET
BAY
MCFC
WED, 2:45PM ET
CFC
SCH
WED, 2:45PM ET
BAR
APO
WED, 2:45PM ET
AJA
PSG
WED, 2:45PM ET
ROMA
CSKA
WED, 2:45PM ET
ATH
SHA

USA Defensive Frailties Give Jurgen Klinsmann Reasons For Concern

usa mens national team 600x280 USA Defensive Frailties Give Jurgen Klinsmann Reasons For Concern

Jürgen Klinsmann has tried to meld the US into a more stylish, free-flowing side playing a 4-3-3 with an emphasis on possession. While the United States has continued to perform well on the attacking end, defensive frailties that were not evident for a decade prior to the 2010 World Cup are now being regularly exposed. Sunday’s 4-3 friendly victory over a German “B” team was a great show for the fans celebrating the 100th anniversary of the US Soccer Federation, but it left many questions entering a critical two week period in World Cup Qualifying. This week the United States has conceded seven goals in friendlies on American soil to Belgium and Germany.

The US manager who radically transformed Germany’s national program in the lead-up to the 2006 World Cup has emphasized fitness and club form over reputation, meaning he has selected a wide variety of players including those from Major League Soccer during his tenure. Unlike his predecessor, Bob Bradley whose selection was largely composed of European based players, many not getting regular time at their respective clubs, Klinsmann has deepened the player pool and given opportunities to many younger players. He has also dropped players that Bradley selected despite not featuring at European clubs.

However, despite yet another milestone friendly win, this time a 4-3 win over Germany in Washington DC, questions persist about Klinsmann’s ability to qualify the United States for its seventh consecutive World Cup, and his competitive record is inferior to that of Bradley’s at the same point in the previous World Cup cycle.  Moreover, the US has defensively been weaker during Klinsmann’s tenure than perhaps any point since before the 1994 World Cup. Part of it is a lack of personnel, but much of it has to do with formation and a desire to play in a more stylish manner.

The desire to play free-flowing attacking football throughout the US system led to the US manager taking a direct role in the appointment of youth coaches as well as encouraging teams in the domestic leagues to use the 4-3-3 system.  This change has been, at least from a results point of view, a failure as the United States is enduring its roughest patch at the youth level since the early 1980s.

In recent matches, Klinsmann has taken the need to create attacking impetus to a new level placing two midfielders, DaMarcus Beasley (who earned his 100th US cap this week) and Brad Evans as fullbacks. While Beasley and Evans aren’t directly to blame, the United States continues to leak goals at the back. The central defense continues to be poor and the communication between keeper Tim Howard and his backline needs to be questioned. Considering Brad Guzan kept two cleans sheets in recent qualifiers and had an outstanding season at Aston Villa, Klinsmann needs to consider a permanent goalkeeper change.

Howard, protected by arguably the best backline in the Premier League, had a solid but unspectacular season at Everton. However, Howard is mistake prone and his ability to organize and communicate well with the US backline has been repeatedly brought into question.

The United States side managed by Klinsmann is very much a work in progress. While the manager has defeated Italy and Mexico in away friendlies, and drew with Russia in Moscow, his side has also struggled twice to beat Antigua in World Cup qualifying and has lost to Jamaica and Honduras also in qualifying.

The upcoming World Cup qualifiers will ultimately tell us a great deal about Klinsmann’s managerial capacity and pragmatism. He has been more rigid in his tactical setup than Bradley, whose in-game adjustments often changed the trajectory of matches. The US under Klinsmann has a set way of playing soccer and tactical/formation changes in-game are rare if ever implemented.

With three World Cup qualifiers in the next two weeks for the United States, an opportunity to assess Klinsmann’s progress with the team will be afforded to us.

About Kartik Krishnaiyer

A lifelong lover of soccer, the beautiful game, he served from January 2010 until May 2013 as the Director of Communications and Public Relations for the North American Soccer League (NASL). Raised on the Fort Lauderdale Strikers of the old NASL, Krishnaiyer previously hosted the American Soccer Show on the Champions Soccer Radio Network, the Major League Soccer Talk podcast and the EPL Talk Podcast. His soccer writing has been featured by several media outlets including The Guardian and The Telegraph. He is the author of the book Blue With Envy about Manchester City FC.
View all posts by Kartik Krishnaiyer →

3 Responses to USA Defensive Frailties Give Jurgen Klinsmann Reasons For Concern

  1. trickybrkn says:

    I beg to differ about the free flowing football deal. JK has never even attempted it. He was hired to do that after we grew tired of the negative approach of Bradley/ Arena. But if you watched the Belgium match what he is doing is playing a high back line and a love midfield. Even Dempsey is called back to defend. and He hardly plays a 4-3-3. he deploys a 4-2-3-1. Huge difference….

    Altidore is left alone up top. He has Dempsey playing a free role, but as stated already, that role calls for him to drop back and defend very often. The biggest issue with the USMNT, is mistakes and players who seem scared to play at the top level. Bradley is by far the most influential player on the team. He dictates the play of the team. Without him v Belgium they where lost. The back line while unexperienced is further exposed by JK’s need to play a high line. there is just NO room for misplay and at top levels counties will make you pay dearly. USMNT is stuck with JK till after Brazil, now that the Everton job is filled. So we will have to suffer throughout the same sorts of tactically mistake prone approach we have lived through since the emergence of US Soccer. It will come down to individuals to step up.

    I really respect Liviu Bird. He truly understands JK’s tactics. http://americansoccernow.com/articles/cold-in-cleveland-the-u-s-struggles-against-belgium I suggest any USMNT fan follow him on twitter, and read his stuff on ASN and soccer wire.com

    And Thank you EPL Talk for a report on the USMNT!

    • ElectricBoogalo says:

      I think the US is kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place when it comes to “playing free-flowing football”.

      Sure, maybe it would be work in qualifying against relatively weaker teams, but when it comes to the WC tournament, the US is always going to be underdogs. Not sure if “free flowing football” is a reasonable expectation when they come up against much better sides.

    • jason says:

      doesn’t make sense. Klinsmann has become headcoach for only 17 months. you can’t compare him to Bradley who WAS head coach for over 41 months. but most significantly, they are doing totally different things. Bradley would never play “friendly” with Germany, Belgium, Italy, Russia… etc. my point is, I don’t know if Bradley is better, may be, may be not. but let’s wait until end of 2014 World Cup before we render our call. one thing for sure, Sunil Gulati knows a lot more about soccer than you and i combined.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>