Why The New Manchester City-Backed MLS Franchise Shouldn’t Be in New York City

As much good work as MLS Commissioner Don Garber has done for MLS in the United States, he occasionally makes American soccer fans scratch their collective heads, like with his recent comment that there’s way too much soccer on television.  Another confounding example in recent months is his effort to land a second MLS team in the New York area. Two weeks ago Garber declared an expansion team announcement was likely in four to six weeks. Last week, reports spread that Manchester City owner Sheikh Mansour is set to fork over the $100 million expansion fee for a new MLS team to be creatively called New York City FC.

I like the idea of the league having 20 teams, but it bothers me that Garber wants it to be in New York City so much.  I understand his rationale – the corporate cash that would flow, the major media exposure, the potential Manchester-like rivalry with the New York Red Bulls, etc.  Understandably, MLS is not going to turn down someone willing to pay that mind-boggling $100 million expansion fee.  But the thought of NYC having a second team and a brand new soccer specific stadium seems unfair when the New York Red Bulls don’t even consistently sell out their own practically brand new soccer specific stadium (Red Bull Arena opened in 2010).  Obviously, New York City is big enough to support two teams but they don’t even support one very well.  The Red Bulls currently rank tenth in the league in attendance, averaging 17,053 per game.

I realize the Red Bulls actually play in Harrison, New Jersey and that the proposed stadium for New York City FC would be in Queens, but it’s still asking a lot for two MLS teams in such close proximity to thrive.  Keep in mind that Los Angeles has the Galaxy and Chivas USA, but the Galaxy have the third highest average attendance in MLS this year (21,271), while Chivas USA have the lowest in the league (8,045).  I’m not saying the situation would absolutely be replicated in New York City, but it should give Garber pause.

With the league already spread so geographically thin across our vast continent, it seems redundant to shoehorn a second franchise in the New York City area when the Southeastern region of the U.S. doesn’t have a single team.  MLS did give the Tampa Bay Mutiny and Miami Fusion a try for several seasons before folding both clubs in 2001 as neither had solid enough fan support, but the soccer climate has changed significantly in the twelve years since those clubs’ demise and it’s time to set up a new team in the region.

Pages 1 2


  1. Stefan Szymanski May 6, 2013
  2. MrTuktoyaktuk May 6, 2013
  3. christian May 6, 2013
    • Pete May 6, 2013
      • Clampdown May 6, 2013
        • CiTyBlUe May 6, 2013
          • CiTyBlUe May 6, 2013
          • USASoccer786 May 11, 2013
  4. Dave May 6, 2013
  5. Matt May 6, 2013
    • christian May 6, 2013
  6. Andrew Beck May 6, 2013
  7. Atlanta Pompey May 6, 2013
  8. Matt May 6, 2013
  9. jtm371 May 6, 2013
  10. Fernando May 6, 2013
  11. CTBlues May 6, 2013
  12. Nick May 6, 2013
    • Fernando May 6, 2013
      • Andrew Beck May 6, 2013
        • Fernando May 6, 2013
          • Andrew Beck May 6, 2013
  13. Dean Stell May 6, 2013
    • Pete May 6, 2013
      • Dean Stell May 6, 2013
        • MindBoggled May 8, 2013
    • CTBlues May 6, 2013
      • Dean Stell May 6, 2013
  14. brn442 May 6, 2013
  15. Marc L May 6, 2013
  16. JFrye May 6, 2013
  17. Flyvanescence May 6, 2013
  18. Casey Hunter Moore May 10, 2013
  19. Derick Dominoe May 10, 2013

Leave a Reply