The U.S. Open Cup Venue Change Controversy

As we approach the matches for Round 3 Proper of the 2012 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup, the discussions continue about the venue switch for the Seattle Sounders vs. Atlanta Silverbacks match.

Here’s the backdrop: if the Silverbacks won their second round match against the Georgia Revolution (which they did), they were drawn to host the three consecutive defending champions Seattle Sounders at Silverbacks Stadium. You would have to believe the gate receipts would be massive in the capital city of the state of Georgia.

But while the North American Soccer League side was already starting to promote the game, something was amiss in the Twitter world. Independent news site, through their Twitter handle @usopencup, broke the rumors that the Sounders made a phone call to move the match to their second home of Starfire Sports Complex.

It took at least an hour to get a final decision once all second round matches officially ended, with the Charlotte Eagles winning on the road at the El Paso Patriots. The deed had been done and the venue change was made.

Now if you listened to my US Open Cup Round 2 Review show, Brian Quarstad of Inside Minnesota Soccer, explained in the movie “A Shot at Glory” about a second division Scottish side hosting a Scottish FA Cup match and the owner selling the rights to their opponents that became the home side.

In a statement to the supporters of the Silverbacks, Chairman Boris Jerkunica said this. “The decision associated with the venue change wasn’t easy, by any means. Seattle Sounders FC presented us with an offer that we simply couldn’t refuse, and in the end, it was a decision that was based on the balance between instant gratification and long-term improvement.”

And it’s not trivial, hosting an event like a U.S. Open Cup match, especially against a well-supported team like Seattle. For one thing, there is a surcharge leveled before the match by the United States Soccer Federation. For Round Three, it is reportedly $12,000, plus 15% of any proceeds over $100,000 (thanks to for this information). For Round Four, it rises to $18,000. In other words, these lower-division clubs must make a blind investment, hoping that the seats in their park are filled by paying customers.

The Silverbacks have already laid out the way that this influx of cash from Seattle will benefit fans and the club. They will host a Fan Appreciation Night on June 16th, offering free tickets for fans to witness their derby against their NASL rival, the Carolina Railhawks. The money should also help the technical staff to identify more talent to bring to the club. Atlanta will also host an exhibition game against an MLS side in this deal.

Now as I have said during the show, I understand that professional sports are a business. I understand that some form of financial transactions will be made. Yet there is something within me that says the integrity of the U.S. Open Cup has been affected.

Yes, I know what happened last year with Hans Backe not taking the trip to Chicago, and charged assistant Mike Petke with managing the Red Bulls in the Quarterfinals. At least they have travelled when they are the road side. The Los Angeles Galaxy will make their trip to WakeMed Soccer Park in the Research Triangle area to face the Railhawks.

What about the new darlings of the US Open Cup in Eric Wynalda’s Cal FC who traveled to Wilmington, North Carolina and defeated the Hammerheads handily? Not only did they go across country for round two, but a road trip to Kitsap, Washington has to be taxing on a USASA side as well. But unfortunately for them, they don’t have corporate backing and a 30,000+ seat cauldron to help them change the course of play in the competition.

We already know how the supporters of the Atlanta Silverbacks feel. Head over to the clubs Facebook page and read some colorful comments. They are severely disappointed at ownership selling their opportunity to watch their club have a go at the Northwestern giants. After going thru a self inflicted hiatus and returning to second division soccer, the fans were returning until this moment came about.

Regardless if the Silverbacks do or don’t have a chance against the three-in-a-row defending US Open Cup Champions, the point was that the fans of the Silverbacks were ready to see an MLS powerhouse. Sadly that opportunity has been taken away.

Whether you want to blame Silverbacks ownership, the Seattle organization for seeking this out, or the United States Soccer Federation for permitting the sale of hosting rights, it does nothing for the Atlanta soccer market. Even if Atlanta miraculously ventures to Washington state and defeats the holders, their fans will only hear about the feat through the grapevine. What a day it could have been in Silverbacks history, but with the way finance works in American soccer, the dollar was worth more than the day in the sun.

Editor’s Note – As a commenter pointed out, Seattle streams their U.S. Open Cup matches, so anyone who would like to see this match can watch at If watching an online feed simulates being at Silverbacks Stadium watching the match live and in person, then there may never be a reason to attend a soccer match (or seek a home pitch advantage) again. 

11 thoughts on “The U.S. Open Cup Venue Change Controversy”

  1. How is this news? More than 10 years go, the Chicago Fire somehow
    managed to “schedule” nearly a dozen Open fixtures either in the
    state of Illinois or at a neutral venue of their choice, regardless
    of any consideration of the term “host”, or any lip service to
    impartiality by the Federation. The Open Cup is a joke and has been
    since Rochester upset Colorado. The fact that The Dewar is in a
    closet somewhere tells you everything you need to know. The
    tournament is no longer authentic, but continues to be staged for
    the interests of The Cabal.

  2. “Even if Atlanta miraculously ventures to Washington state and
    defeats the holders, their fans will only hear about the feat
    through the grapevine.” Wrong – and I bet you didn’t even bother to
    look up the fact that the Sounders stream their USOC early round
    matches. Atlanta supporters could have some pretty awesome viewing
    parties if they chose. I’m kind of disappointed in the pandering
    angle. It would be awesome to see an article about the USOC
    history, and how often there has been a “must play” draw (what,
    zero?). And don’t fool yourself about the Red Bulls last year –
    they traveled because it was cheaper than hosting, period. Seattle
    (and RSL, and Portland – oh, maybe your readers didn’t know, THREE
    3rd round ties would have been moved if the Hammerheads hadn’t
    choked – but hey, make it about Seattle’s pocketbook, stay quiet
    about DC not playing an away match for what, three years?) is one
    of the reasons the USOC gets the attention it does. The tournament
    was dying on the vine. Unfortunately, with that attention comes the
    army of US fans who believe we need to be run by the FA. C’est la

  3. And now that the potential 4th round matchups have been
    announced…it’s all based on location. For example, LA v Chivas.
    Timbers v Sounders. NE v NY. DC v Philly. I can see keeping it
    along conference lines, but this isn’t what I expected. It’s not
    really a big deal, but I just don’t like matchups based 100% on

  4. Hater logic: If the Sounders with the US Open Cup (an unprecedented
    4th consecutive), it will be declared that it’s a worthless
    tournament that doesn’t matter and the silverware doesn’t count;
    honestly it should be cancelled. If anyone else wins it, that team
    will deservedly have won a historic, heroic championship that is
    right up there with Supporter’s Shield in importance. Good on
    Seattle for being a shark of an organization who fights for their
    fans and their team.

  5. I don’t have a problem with lower division teams being able to sell
    their hosting rights in the tournament at this stage in the cycle
    of US Soccer development. Those teams need money more than they
    need anything else. If a team thinks it’s a better deal for them to
    travel, more power to them for it. In fact, I wish the USOC would
    go for a French Cup-style rule that automatically awarded hosting
    rights to the lower division team (so long as they have a dedicated

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *