There’s More Than One City in the Premier League

After Swansea City’s well-deserved victory against Manchester City Sunday, where the Welsh club worked its socks off for 94 minutes, I think it’s time that the Swans deserve some respect. Throughout this entire season, the team has stuck to its philosophy in terms of the way it plays football, and has always tried to play an entertaining brand. Along the way, they’ve learned a lot and we’ve seen them make substantial progress in front of our eyes — evident by the reversal of the 4-0 loss on the opening weekend of the season against Manchester City, and the one-nil victory yesterday.

The Swans have earned the respect of a lot of neutrals and opposing fans (and managers). But the one thing that has pissed me off this season is how the press, match commentators, bloggers and pundits talk about “City,” and everyone expects them to presume they’re talking about Manchester City. When it’s a game where Manchester City plays Manchester United, for example, then the “City” reference is completely obvious to differentiate the two team names. But when Manchester City plays Swansea City, and the public still refers to “City” as if we’re supposed to know that there’s only one “City” in the Premier League (i.e. Manchester City), that upsets me. In fact, I find it condescending.

Other than Manchester City, there are three other City clubs in the Premier League: Swansea City, Stoke City and Norwich City. If there was only one “City” in the league, and Manchester City was it, I could understand it. But there isn’t. Just as there is not only one United in the Premier League.

A good example of how lazy the mainstream press is in regards to the use of the word “City” comes from The Guardian’s preview of the Swansea City against Manchester City match. Written by the usually reliable Kevin McCarra, have a guess which team he’s talking about when he mentions:

“City had 15 shots on target when these sides met in the opening round of fixtures, more than any other team in any other game in 2011-12”

Does The Guardian mean Swansea City or Manchester City? Without looking up the stats myself to find out, I have absolutely no idea. I’m guessing he means Manchester City, but there’s no way of knowing that from the above sentence.

The reason all of this upsets me and why I want to get it off my chest is because the vast majority of people have a Top Four or Sky Six bias to the Premier League. There are 20 teams in the league, each of them have earned a place in the Premiership, and each of them deserving our respect. However, when the media talks so much about “City,” “United,” “Spurs,” “Arsenal” and “Chelsea,” it’s no wonder that pundits get lazy when talking about the City’s and United’s of the world because they’re so used to uttering those names without thinking twice about it.

Maybe, just maybe, people will start to change their thinking especially as the City’s of the Premier League — Swansea, Stoke and Norwich — continue to take points away from the other teams in the league. In scenarios where a “City” is playing another “City,” the media and viewers should use the club nicknames to avoid confusion (i.e. the Swans against the Citizens). Just talking about “City,” and presuming we know who you’re discussing, displays ignorance and a lack of respect.

52 Comments

  1. Stu March 12, 2012
    • Stu March 12, 2012
    • The Gaffer March 12, 2012
      • Stu March 12, 2012
  2. Alex March 12, 2012
  3. Stu March 12, 2012
    • Daniel March 12, 2012
  4. Marc March 12, 2012
  5. dust March 12, 2012
    • The Gaffer March 12, 2012
      • Clampdown March 12, 2012
        • The Gaffer March 12, 2012
      • Lyle March 13, 2012
  6. Stu March 12, 2012
  7. The Gaffer March 12, 2012
    • Nonsense March 12, 2012
    • Why? March 12, 2012
      • The Gaffer March 12, 2012
    • harry cee March 12, 2012
  8. Why? March 12, 2012
    • The Gaffer March 12, 2012
  9. BBC March 12, 2012
    • The Gaffer March 12, 2012
  10. Ryan B March 12, 2012
  11. Efrain March 12, 2012
    • The Gaffer March 12, 2012
      • Efrain March 13, 2012
    • CTBlues March 12, 2012
      • Efrain March 13, 2012
  12. Dust March 12, 2012
    • Why? March 13, 2012
      • dust March 14, 2012
        • Why? March 16, 2012
  13. Ardwickian March 12, 2012
  14. dlink09 March 12, 2012
    • The Gaffer March 12, 2012
      • Guy March 13, 2012
        • The Gaffer March 13, 2012
  15. Lyle March 12, 2012
    • The Gaffer March 13, 2012
  16. Lyle March 13, 2012
  17. Mike Perez March 13, 2012
    • The Gaffer March 13, 2012
  18. Mark March 13, 2012
  19. mark March 14, 2012
    • The Gaffer March 14, 2012
  20. Ardwickian March 14, 2012
  21. DiNozzo March 15, 2012
    • The Gaffer March 15, 2012
  22. alex April 6, 2012
    • Guy April 6, 2012

Leave a Reply