WED, 12PM ET
ZEN1
BEN0
WED, 2:45PM ET
ARS2
BVB0
WED, 2:45PM ET
LUD2
LIV2
WED, 2:45PM ET
BAS0
REAL1
WED, 2:45PM ET
MAL0
JUV1
WED, 2:45PM ET
LEV0
MON1

Tottenham 2-1 Liverpool: Spotlight Match Review

An intriguing meeting of current and past Top 4 football clubs in England took place Sunday, as Tottenham Hotspur edged Liverpool in the waning minutes to continue their push towards the top.

Tottenham v Liverpool 11.28.10 11th Minute Tottenham 2 1 Liverpool: Spotlight Match Review

Tottenham v Liverpool 11th Minute Formation

Tottenham and Liverpool both assembled 4-4-2 formations. Peter Crouch and Rafael van der Vaart were Tottenham’s strikers from the open, but in the 11th minute van der Vaart re-aggravated a lingering  hamstring injury and was forced off for Jermain Defoe. For the Reds, David Ngog and Fernando Torres played up front, with support from wide midfielders Dirk Kuyt and Maxi Rodriguez.

The game had a wonderful flow about it, especially in the first half. The midfield attack for both teams was churning at full gear, and both teams showed initiative on offense. The best first-half chance for Tottenham came off a throw-in, as Luka Modric darted past Martin Skrtel towards the goal line. His cross to Crouch was thwarted by goalkeeper Pepe Reina, but he couldn’t contain the rebound. The ball settled to Defoe’s feet at the 6 yd line, and the only obstacle that prevented a goal was Jamie Carragher’s well-placed left foot.

Liverpool had plenty of opportunities as well, but they were forced to wait until the 42nd minute to open the book. Off a Raul Meireles free kick just inside the center line, the ball was jostled around off Skrtel and Ngog near the 6 yd box. The ball dropped to Skrtel’s feet, and he deposited the ball past Heurelio Gomes. This gave Liverpool a 1-0 lead at the half.

Tottenham had already used two substitutions for injury (Defoe for van der Vaart, and Sebastian Bassong for Younas Kaboul), so they couldn’t afford to make a positive personnel adjustment after halftime. If there was any adjustment, Liverpool’s Kuyt and Maxi played more of a level midfield line on defense, making two solid banks of 4 for Tottenham to try to break.

This less-aggressive midfield tactic allowed Tottenham to seize control of the play. In fact, Liverpool’s only on-target shot after half came from Torres, and that was from 40 yards, and it didn’t test Gomes. Spurs poured it on, and Liverpool held their lead for 20 minutes, which included a penalty miss by Defoe off a wall handball by Ngog.

In the 65th minute, Modric took advantage of a misjudgment by Carragher. Carragher tried to close him down outside the area, and Modric jetted around him. At the 6 yard line, Modric crossed towards Crouch, but Skrtel’s effort to block the cross pushed it past Reina and into the goal. His own goal brought the game even.

What I believe to be the most important moment in this match came around the 87th minute. Carragher was forced off with an arm injury, and Sotirios Kyrgiakos came on to relieve him. Spurs manager Harry Redknapp must have seen an opportunity for Crouch to use his height to gain an advantage on Kyrgiakos, because long balls from left-back Benoit Assou-Ekotto to Crouch became the favored vehicle towards the end of the match. 2 minutes into stoppage time, this strategy paid off. A long aerial from Assou-Ekotto was won by Crouch, and the ball came directly to right wing Aaron Lennon. As he trapped the ball forward with his chest, he motored past Paul Konchesky, and send the Reds back to Liverpool dejected with a well-placed right foot, 2-1.

Liverpool appeared to be willing to sit on a 1-0 away lead in the second half, and it cost them in the end. While Torres was effective at times, Ngog seemed off the pace in this match, and he should have cost the Reds the lead with his silly penalty. Manager Roy Hodgson’s defensive second half came apart when the Spurs speedy midfielders took advantage of flatfeet in the backfield. Both Carragher and Konchesky were unprepared for the pace that hit them on the two Tottenham goals.  In addition, Assou-Ekotto had been relatively successful throughout the contest in getting balls forward to Crouch, but perhaps the rushed way Kyrgiakos came onto the pitch gave Redknapp the idea to test him. Carragher showed visible disdain at the fact that Kyrgiakos wasn’t prepared to enter. Perhaps the lack of time to stretch and prepare for battle against Crouch became the undoing of Liverpool.

Regardless, it was an entertaining match. There wasn’t a lot of tactical wrangling to be had, but in the end the speed of Modric and Lennon overcame a slightly less positive 2nd half approach by the Reds, and gave Spurs the comeback victory.

This entry was posted in General, Leagues: EPL. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Tottenham 2-1 Liverpool: Spotlight Match Review

  1. Brendan M. says:

    “Spurs manager Harry Redknapp must have seen an opportunity for Crouch to use his height to gain an advantage on Kyrgiakos”

    Huh? The Greek is Liverpool’s best player on balls in the air. He’s much bigger than Carra, and would be a much worse matchup for Crouch in the air.

    • Liam says:

      Giving ‘arry a bit too much credit, methinks. Hoof it Crouchie is always plan A for spurs when he’s playing. Just ask van der Vaart where all his tap-ins come from.

    • Earl Reed says:

      You guys are probably right, Crouch is a typical target when he’s out there regardless of who is defending. I thought perhaps Kyrgiakos’ quick out-of-the-seat might have made for a weakness. It was just a play that worked out the way it was drawn up.

  2. Mike C says:

    Crouch winning balls in the air and knocking them down or playing to space seems to win games for Hotspur, Capello needs to look at that as we don’t have the talent to play Serie A style football.

  3. kadine says:

    This was not the best thing that could happen to liverpool. But although they lost they did put on a good performance than before. My point is that they will loose on Monday against A Villa.

  4. I don’t see how Hodsgon believes that Torres and Ngog can play upfront together, they need another option and should never have sold Crouch

  5. Jack says:

    In a match that Liverpool actually played quite well it was fitting that they should lose because of the useless Konchesky who was bought by the clueless Hodgson. I’m putting a tenner on Villa next Monday as Houllier is a much better manager than Hodgson and despite all their injuries Villa’s young guns are a joy to watch.

  6. Thomas says:

    While the match against Arsenal make some incredibly vital tactical interventions (removing an inept Lennon, moving VDV into the middle to combat Arsenals midfield 3, etc.), this match was really more of a classic English affair, with the match coming down to 1 on 1 situations between the players.

    Redknapp has often scoffed at the importance of tactics, and has always placed a bigger emphasis on the 11 on the field more than anything else. This was evident today .

    Plain and simple, Konchesky was no match for Lennon with regards to pace, and there was really no way he was going to contain him. He lost the 1 on 1 with him, and it cost Liverpool an away point.

    And yes Spurs love playing long balls for Crouch to knock down, but it has been incredibly effective. I want to say Crouch has 6 or so assissts this season from knockdowns.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>