The Guardian Gifts Qatar 2022 World Cup Bid An Easy Ride And Commits Ethics Fail

LONDON, ENGLAND - AUGUST 05:  A man lights a cigarette in front of the offices of The Guardian and The Observer newspapers on August 5, 2009 in London, England. The Guardian Media Group's Sunday newspaper, The Observer, which was founded in 1791 and is the world's oldest Sunday newspaper, is potentially facing closure.  (Photo by Oli Scarff/Getty Images)

If you were the Qatar World Cup Bid Committee, how would you generate some last minute favorable publicity before the votes were cast for the 2022 World Cup? One way would be to send journalists of influential newspapers on an all-expenses paid visit to Qatar. And then hope that the articles they write would put the 2022 Qatar World Cup bid in a positive light.

And that’s exactly what the Qatar World Cup Bid Committee did.

On Thursday, The Guardian published an article written by Louise Taylor entitled “Why the heat is on Fifa to give the 2022 World Cup to Qatar.” The headline alone was priceless. Even the Qatar 2022 PR team couldn’t have come up with one as “better” as that. The sub-head “The legacy of a World Cup in Doha would be far more than simply football” was equally a PR dream-come-true.

As for the article itself, it was a puff piece of the highest order. The closest The Guardian got to criticism or negativity is the mentions of the alcohol ban and Israeli passports (and passport stamps) not going down too well in Qatar, but both of these are brushed off with ease by Taylor. In her article, there’s no mention of Qatar’s foreign laborers, who would be responsible for helping to build the stadiums and infrastructure (Qatar’s strict laws regarding foreign laborers have been described by the United States Department of State as akin to modern-day slavery). Nor is there a mention of the discrimination and violence against women in Qatar.

Instead the article lauds Qatar’s “technological wizardry” for designing air-conditioned stadiums (even though the plans were announced last April), as well as touting the “fabulous beach-front hotels, ancient souks, modern shopping malls and the capital’s excellent Museum of Islamic Arts should provide high calibre relaxation.” Taylor goes even suggests that “With a successful tournament serving as a highly effective slap in the face of extremism, Islamic fundamentalists could even be in for some overdue marginalisation,” and then adds:

“It is surely not impossible that greater regional rapprochement could be achieved through impromptu political talking shops convened alongside the football fields of Doha than during countless conventional conferences in Washington, Jerusalem or Sharm el-Sheikh.”

A pipe dream, perhaps? But Taylor also managed to get a few quotes from Sir Alex Ferguson in the article, to add some weight and credibility to the argument why Qatar are deserving of hosting the tournament.

When Guardian Sports Editor Sean Ingle was asked Wednesday whether Taylor’s trip was paid by the Qatar World Cup Bid Committee, Ingle replied:

“She was on a press trip along with several other publications.”

Ingle, instead of answering the question directly, dodged it and implied that if other newspapers were on the same trip, then it was okay if The Guardian was part of the same expense-paid press junket.

Ingle added that I should refer to Guardian Sports Blog Editor Steve Busfield regarding the answer. However, Busfield regurgitated a similar response which neither confirmed or denied whether Louise Taylor’s trip had been paid by the Qatar World Cup Bid Committee or not. He deemed his response a “Full Disclosure” despite the fact that it never disclosed whether Taylor’s trip had been an expense-paid trip or not.

“Louise Taylor was on a press trip to Qatar with several other national newspaper and broadcasting journalists, ahead of the decision for the 2022 World Cup next week. During the trip Louise wrote news stories about the Brazil v Argentina match and on Alex Ferguson (“I’m in no mood for retiring at Manchester United“). She was asked to write a comment piece about her impressions of Qatar.”

The Guardian’s decision to have Taylor write other stories while she was in Qatar didn’t change the fact that her trip’s expenses were paid by Qatar 2022. Just because she wrote other articles while she was there shouldn’t forgive The Guardian‘s poor decision to accept the offer of the expense-paid sojourn in the first place.

Readers of Taylor’s “Why the heat is on Fifa to give the 2022 World Cup to Qatar” article were quick to question The Guardian whether they would confirm or deny that Taylor’s trip had been paid for or not. Even after Busfield shared his poor attempt at a “Full Disclosure,” Guardian readers continued asking the same question over and over: “Was this press trip funded by the Qatari bid? If so, why was there no disclosure on the original article to this effect?”

Finally, almost four hours after Busfield included in his “Full Disclosure” comment, The Guardian Sports Blog Editor finally confirmed that, yes, “The trip was organised and paid for by the Qatar 2022 World Cup bid committee.”

Taylor’s article is a perfect example of why newspapers should never accept free trips from the people they cover. When journalists are sent on an all-expenses-paid trip, it’s human nature for them to feel that they “owe” the organization who sponsored the trip, in this case the 2022 Qatar World Cup Bid Committee, something. It’s why organizations such as the Qatar 2022 World Cup Bid Committee finance these trips because they know it’s the easiest way to garner positive PR. And it’s why some news organizations, such as The New York Times which has a strict business ethics policy, forbid journalists from accepting expense-paid trips.

For a newspaper as highly regarded as The Guardian, it made a critical mistake when deciding to accept the offer of an expense-paid trip to Doha. Not only that, but the newspaper didn’t, at first, reveal in the article that the Qatar World Cup Bid Committee had paid for Taylor’s trip. If it wasn’t for the prodding by The Guardian‘s own readers, it’s possible that the newspaper may never have revealed that the article had been written as a result of an expense-paid trip.

I’m sure it was tempting to send Louise Taylor from 41F in London to Doha, which is 86F this time of the year, but The Guardian should be more open when publishing articles in the future. Full disclosure should be revealed more transparently rather than trying to hide behind it and then burying the information deep on the second page of comments.

In this particular example, the readers of The Guardian are owed an apology. No media organizations are infallible, but it certainly seems that The Guardian made a mistake in this example by not providing a full disclosure with this article. And, it can be argued, by publishing an article that reads more like an advertorial than a journalist’s attempt to write about a topic with a critical eye. We expect more from The Guardian than this. In the world of football journalism, when The Guardian often shines as a leader in its field, it’s a rare mistake from the newspaper. Hopefully they’ll see the error of their ways and not repeat it again.

132 Comments

  1. bob marley November 29, 2010
    • Charles November 29, 2010
    • Dumpertruck November 29, 2010
      • michal November 29, 2010
        • girl December 4, 2010
      • michal November 29, 2010
    • sucka99 December 1, 2010
    • YARA December 2, 2010
    • Rami December 3, 2010
  2. J November 29, 2010
  3. DonIsGood November 29, 2010
    • J November 29, 2010
      • Mohammed Al T November 29, 2010
        • J November 29, 2010
        • 11nat May 3, 2011
    • girl December 4, 2010
    • 11nat May 3, 2011
  4. T November 29, 2010
  5. Nayef Aldosari November 29, 2010
    • Ayman November 29, 2010
      • Nayef Aldosari December 1, 2010
        • A December 4, 2010
  6. Arnil Mintera November 29, 2010
  7. US citizen November 29, 2010
    • yara December 2, 2010
  8. Faisal Shukoor November 29, 2010
    • Angus November 29, 2010
      • Up the Chels! November 29, 2010
        • michal November 29, 2010
        • Angus November 29, 2010
    • Pierre November 29, 2010
      • sucka99 December 3, 2010
        • Nasy February 22, 2011
  9. Stuart Goodwin November 29, 2010
    • Peter November 29, 2010
  10. Andy Kay November 29, 2010
  11. Dave C November 29, 2010
    • leftwingback November 29, 2010
  12. Jesse Chula November 29, 2010
  13. Peter November 29, 2010
  14. patrick November 29, 2010
    • Nayef Aldosari November 30, 2010
  15. Clampdown November 29, 2010
  16. Ringo November 29, 2010
    • ecron November 29, 2010
      • michal November 29, 2010
  17. jeneria November 29, 2010
  18. Kal November 29, 2010
  19. Vious November 29, 2010
  20. Fate November 29, 2010
    • J November 29, 2010
    • yaraz December 2, 2010
  21. Rick November 29, 2010
  22. dlink09 November 29, 2010
  23. Morris November 29, 2010
    • michal November 29, 2010
    • Jim November 29, 2010
    • Nayef Aldosari November 30, 2010
      • S November 30, 2010
  24. Evelyn November 29, 2010
    • michal November 30, 2010
  25. M November 30, 2010
  26. S November 30, 2010
  27. WaZ December 1, 2010
  28. AdeshinaOne December 1, 2010
    • Earl Reed December 2, 2010
      • Yara December 2, 2010
        • sucka99 December 3, 2010
  29. njndirish December 1, 2010
    • 11nat May 3, 2011
  30. Nayef Aldosari December 2, 2010
    • njndirish December 2, 2010
      • Nayef Aldosari December 2, 2010
        • amoon December 3, 2010
  31. Ryan December 2, 2010
  32. Yara December 2, 2010
  33. Alex December 2, 2010
    • wzz December 7, 2010
  34. Hisham December 3, 2010
    • sucka99 December 3, 2010
  35. amoon December 3, 2010
    • A December 4, 2010
    • Nayef Aldosari December 6, 2010
  36. Nodz December 4, 2010
    • girl December 4, 2010
    • Nayef Aldosari December 6, 2010
      • The Gaffer December 6, 2010
        • Nayef Aldosari December 7, 2010
          • The Gaffer December 7, 2010
          • bnt_qatar December 7, 2010
            • The Gaffer December 7, 2010
              • Nayef Aldosari December 8, 2010
                • amoon December 8, 2010
                • bnt_qatar December 8, 2010
          • yara December 7, 2010
          • bnt_qatar December 7, 2010
  37. Cameron December 4, 2010
  38. girl December 4, 2010
  39. Jessey December 4, 2010
  40. girl December 4, 2010
  41. MADDI December 6, 2010
  42. MADDI December 6, 2010
  43. MADDI December 6, 2010
  44. MADDI December 6, 2010
  45. jeneria December 7, 2010
    • The Gaffer December 7, 2010
  46. bnt_qatar December 7, 2010
  47. amoon December 8, 2010
  48. sucka99 December 8, 2010
  49. Nayef Aldosari December 8, 2010
    • bnt_qatar December 8, 2010
      • Nayef Aldosari December 9, 2010
        • bnt_qatar December 9, 2010
  50. Amoon December 9, 2010
    • bnt_qatar December 9, 2010
      • Amoon December 10, 2010
        • bnt_qatar December 10, 2010
  51. Ash December 14, 2010
  52. F FIFA December 18, 2010
    • bnt_qatar December 18, 2010
  53. Dont deserve it December 19, 2010
    • bnt_qatar December 19, 2010
      • No Qatar December 20, 2010
        • bnt_qatar December 20, 2010
          • sucka99 December 20, 2010
          • bnt_qatar December 20, 2010
          • sucka99 December 20, 2010
  54. Imran December 29, 2010
    • Maddi January 18, 2011
  55. Maddi March 27, 2011
  56. cono September 13, 2011
  57. Taz109 June 30, 2012

Leave a Reply