Why The Olympic Stadium Should Not Become A Premier League Stadium

LONDON, ENGLAND - JULY 27: A general view of the continuing construction work on the Olympic Stadium in Stratford on July 27, 2010 in London, England. Today marks two years to go until the London Olympic Games in 2012 and the London 2012 organising committee are launching their appeal for up to 70,000 volunteers to assist in the running of the Games. (Photo by Oli Scarff/Getty Images)
Tottenham Hotspur today made a surprise bid to move into the Olympic Stadium after the 2012 London Olympics. The bid now means that two Premier Leagues will be going head-to-head in a battle to be homed in the stadium after West Ham United also submitted a bit.

Tottenham Chairman Daniel Levy admits the club are simply covering themselves as they continue to look for a new home,  saying: “It is only prudent and good management that we ensure that we investigate all possible options.”

But Karren Brady, Vice-Chair at West Ham feels that the Hammers are the most sensible choice. Earlier this year she told BBC Sport: “We are a natural, logical solution. We want to create a positive, vibrant ongoing legacy.

“We’ve made no secret of the fact we would be the best tenant and make the best use of the site where we can not only incorporate Premier League football, we can add athletics and we’re in discussions with international cricket and rugby as well.”

It is the fact that Ms Brady feels that a football stadium should incorporate other sports that is causing the debate. Lord Sebastian Coe, the man behind bringing the games to London, has already insisted that the Arena will be used as the countries number one athletics venue after the games, meaning the running track will remain in place.

I can understand why Lord Coe is insistent on the Stratford stadium retaining its Olympic heritage after the games, and for this reason both West Ham and Tottenham would be foolish to move in to the stadium.

Yes the facilities would be a vast improvement for both clubs, and I’m sure they would be able to attract more fans by moving in to the new arena, but the fact is that the spectator will only lose out with a running track in place.

Away from the pitch it is hard to generate an atmosphere; you almost become detached from the game itself. The atmospheres at Upton Park and White Hart Lane are amongst the best in the country. If either club moves in to the Olympic Stadium, you can guarantee that the fans would suffer, and this impressive vocal support would be diminished.

What do you think? Would a multi-use stadium really work in the Premier League?


  1. Liam October 1, 2010
    • DP3 October 1, 2010
  2. Renie October 1, 2010
    • The Gaffer October 1, 2010
      • Renie October 1, 2010
        • The Gaffer October 1, 2010
  3. Earl Reed October 1, 2010
  4. fsquid October 1, 2010
  5. nc October 1, 2010
  6. Jim October 1, 2010
  7. Jeremy October 1, 2010
  8. patrick October 1, 2010
  9. patrick October 1, 2010
  10. canyid October 1, 2010
  11. condor October 1, 2010
  12. Hugin October 1, 2010
  13. d rock October 2, 2010
  14. Wilson October 2, 2010
  15. Terry Underhill February 14, 2011
  16. Zahide December 15, 2012

Leave a Reply