WED, 2:45PM ET
LIV
REAL
WED, 2:45PM ET
AND
ARS
WED, 2:45PM ET
OLY
JUV
WED, 2:45PM ET
GAL
BVB
WED, 2:45PM ET
ATL
MAL
WED, 2:45PM ET
LEV
ZEN

What Will the World Cup Look Like In 2014?

 What Will the World Cup Look Like In 2014?

Four years ago, which seems like a lifetime in Internet years, the 2006 World Cup experience was very different than it is today. There were only a handful of soccer podcasts worldwide. Soccer blogs were a relatively new thing. And the TV coverage was decent. All games were televised but national anthems were skipped and the analysis and commentary on ESPN was, at times, comical.

In 2010, we’ve come a long way. But if 2010 has been so incredible in terms of the quality and quantity of coverage – and so successful when you consider that 34% of all Americans have watched some of the World Cup telecasts this summer – what will the 2014 experience be like?

World Cup 2010 has already crashed Twitter several times. I believe one of the biggest benefactors of the World Cup Twitter phenomenon will be the Premier League. When the new season starts up in mid-August, they’re will be a significant increase in the number of soccer fans conversing about the league on Twitter.

But in 2014, Twitter may not exist. Same with Facebook. Both of those social networking tools may be old hat by then such is the way MySpace is now. Or they may be bought and morphed into something new. There’s no doubt that social media will be an important facet of the 2014 World Cup – it has been a game changer for the 2010 one – but social media technology changes so rapidly that it’s almost impossible to predict how it’ll be so different in 2014.

One thing is for sure. I don’t see the TV coverage changing much. ESPN has mastered how a World Cup needs to be presented. And I don’t see them messing too much with the proven formula. The next World Cup will be in Brazil so hopefully some of the kick-off times will be more US-friendly, but knowing FIFA’s penchant for kowtowing to Europe by scheduling games that tend to be primetime there, don’t expect the kick-off times to be as reasonable as they should be.

A side note: England’s biggest viewing audience for a 2010 World Cup game, thus far, has been the 18.84 million who watched the 0-0 draw against Algeria (poor, unfortunate souls). In the United States, probably for the first time ever, the TV viewing audience for a World Cup game was bigger than in England. A record 19.4 million watched Ghana versus the US. That is a massive milestone in the history of the sport in this country.

One big difference with the TV experience of the 2014 World Cup will be the way we’ll consume it. By then, I predict more people will be watching the tournament online than on television. Online could be considered on mobile phones, on iPad like devices (but smaller, thinner and more powerful than the first generation Apple iPad) and on the web, where you’ll not only see the games as you do now, but you’ll also be able to choose different camera angles and customize your viewing experience to your taste.

Some of you may predict that the TV experience of the 2014 World Cup will be different because 3D technology will be commonplace and much more advanced by then. I still think it’s a fad. I don’t see how or why soccer fans would want to wear glasses – which would be very uncomfortable after two hours of wearing them – to watch a game that looks so good regularly.

So the 2014 World Cup will be a similar experience in many ways to 2010. I’m sure we’ll be watching many of the games on mobile phones. The TV ratings will be through the roof and will surpass all American sports except for NFL. That is, if the United States men’s national team can be significant improvements between now and then. Internet usage will be bigger than TV. World Cup advertising will be everywhere and will completely inundate us.

The whole world will be watching, including us.

This entry was posted in General, Leagues: EPL and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

About Christopher Harris

Founder and publisher of World Soccer Talk, Christopher Harris is the managing editor of the site. He has been interviewed by The New York Times, The Guardian and several other publications. Plus he has made appearances on NPR, BBC World, CBC, BBC Five Live, talkSPORT and beIN SPORT. Harris, who has lived in Florida since 1984, has supported Swansea City since 1979. He's also an expert on soccer in South Florida, and got engaged during half-time of a MLS game. Harris launched EPL Talk in 2005, which was rebranded as World Soccer Talk in 2013.
View all posts by Christopher Harris →

9 Responses to What Will the World Cup Look Like In 2014?

  1. Nnanna says:

    In 2014 , you probably won’t need glasses to view 3D content

  2. Alex says:

    I don’t know about others, but I watched at least three matches on my phone through MobiTV. I had to watch the US-Slovenia match at a work conference. I also spent most of the 3rd set of group games with one game on TV and the other on my phone. Well worth it.

    It’s hard to imagine twitter and facebook becoming obsolete, but I suppose I felt the same way about AOL when I began watching my first World Cup in 2002.

  3. sucka99 says:

    “but knowing FIFA’s pension for kowtowing to Europe by scheduling games”

    pension or penchant

  4. sucka99 says:

    i also agree that 3D is a fad. They’re trying to push it on us thru our sports and our kids, but beyond movies I don’t see it taking off. And there’s no political pressure behind it like DRM with HDTV/HDCP

  5. JW says:

    While I’m sure FIFA will gear match times as much as possible towards European audiences, this will be a huge tournament for American TV audiences: regardless of how great the U.S. ratings have been so far this year, they would not compare to a prime-time audience, especially for a USA match.
    Just think: each of the tournaments that has really been widely broadcast in the US (2002, 2006, 2010) have had match times that widely overlapped with people’s work or sleep. I can easily envision even more buzz in 2014 for, let’s say a noon, 4:30 and 8:30 schedule: lunchtime, Happy Hour, and primetime. What could be better than that??

  6. Brn442 says:

    ” 3D technology will be commonplace and much more advanced by then. I still think it’s a fad.”
    I ‘m sure someone said the same about colour television.

    Mobile device watching will be the norm in 4 years via ubiquitous wifi or hmmm, “7G?” networks? coupled with blazing download speeds and dvr style retention memory, even on phones.

    The shift to match kick offs in Prime Time of the host nation has to happen eventually.

    ESPN’s coverage has been great but will be better in FIFA allows greater “touchline” and post-match, lockeroom access and interviews.

    Pubs in America have seen the world cup as a cash cow, and with the CLeague final now on Saturdays, expect to see them take advantage tenfold, coupled with more corporate sponsored outdoor viewing parties.

  7. Matt D says:

    All I know is that I will be at the World Cup in 2014 since I have family in Brazil. Now I just have to figure out where and how to find tickets to the matches! :O

  8. Panda says:

    The games should be on at a reasonable time for me finally. Even if the games are on as early as 12pm EST, which would be primetime in most of Europe that’s still an improvement than the 4am games I’ve had to watch here in Los Angeles.

  9. Lyle says:

    I agree, 3D is a fad. Nothing happening there. Bad investment if you ask me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>