ESPN's Adrian Healey Confuses Slovakia with Slovenia

Looking at the ESPN’s team of commentators for the 2010 World Cup TV coverage, we knew ahead of time that Adrian Healey and John Harkes were the weakest links in a team that features some of the best commentators in the world. Both men are qualified professionals. However, they’re not nearly as good as Martin Tyler, Derek Rae, Ian Darke and others. Unfortunately, Harkes and Healey showed two perfect examples of the improvements they need to make Sunday during the live coverage of the Slovakia versus Paraguay game.

Harkes and Healey both like to talk and they tend to talk so much that it can send the TV viewer into a daydream and detract from what is happening on the pitch itself. Such was the case for the 30-60 seconds leading up to the first goal of the game where both Healey and Harkes had a conversation on-air about how Paraguay qualified for the World Cup. Harkes added that “it’s not how you get there, but it’s what you do when you get there.” While the words were directed at Paraguay, they were true for Harkes, too. What he missed was Paraguay winning the ball in a dangerous area of the pitch and advancing in front of the penalty area and their clinical pass that fell into Enrique Vera’s path, which he hit with the outside of his foot into the corner of the net.

Harkes finished up his sentence just as the ball was going into the goal. What he should have done was to stop his train of thought. Or, better yet, Healey should have broken into the commentary to stop Harkes from rambling and focus him on what was developing on the pitch.

To make matters worse, a couple of minutes later, Adrian Healey wished everyone a happy father’s day but then put his foot in his mouth when he said that it was Slovenia playing Paraguay.

Both Healey and Harkes need to concentrate on their games work. They also need to limit the amount of statistics that they throw out because it takes the viewer away from the game and into la-la land where it’s hard to focus on what’s happening on the pitch when the topic of conversation has nothing to do with what’s happening right now.

ESPN’s coverage of the 2010 World Cup has been exemplary since it has started. But it’s important that the integrity of the commentating and analysis remains top notch. Both Healey and Harkes can do better, but they just need to concentrate at the game at hand and let the match do the talking.

53 Comments

  1. dlink09 June 20, 2010
    • The Gaffer June 20, 2010
    • WC2014 for USA June 26, 2010
    • Yoram Yasur February 1, 2013
  2. Chris June 20, 2010
  3. bayou June 20, 2010
  4. Martinj June 20, 2010
    • eplnfl June 20, 2010
  5. brn442 June 20, 2010
  6. chicuse June 20, 2010
    • brn442 June 20, 2010
    • oliver June 21, 2010
  7. RVPFan June 20, 2010
    • Evan June 20, 2010
      • BobbyB June 20, 2010
        • Evan June 20, 2010
  8. SanDimas1988 June 20, 2010
  9. robert June 20, 2010
  10. SSReporters June 20, 2010
  11. young cluff June 20, 2010
    • SanDimas1988 June 20, 2010
    • Pakapala June 20, 2010
      • This One Guy in Detroit June 20, 2010
        • ovalball June 20, 2010
    • BBC June 20, 2010
  12. jspec June 20, 2010
    • Pakapala June 20, 2010
  13. jspec June 20, 2010
  14. Pakapala June 20, 2010
  15. cmasia June 20, 2010
    • Panda June 20, 2010
    • Pakapala June 20, 2010
  16. Peter June 20, 2010
    • This One Guy in Detroit June 20, 2010
  17. Lyle June 20, 2010
    • The Gaffer June 20, 2010
      • Lyle June 21, 2010
        • The Gaffer June 21, 2010
  18. Carolyn June 20, 2010
  19. Stewy June 20, 2010
    • Gary Talarino June 21, 2010
      • Matt June 21, 2010
    • Pakapala June 21, 2010
  20. Pablo June 21, 2010
  21. Alligator22 June 21, 2010
    • IntelAlly June 22, 2010
    • Pakapala June 25, 2010
  22. IntelAlly June 22, 2010
  23. redenek June 25, 2010
  24. Brett June 27, 2010
  25. redenek June 27, 2010
  26. Mia June 28, 2010

Leave a Reply