Powered by
Univision Deportes
JUL 5 12PM ET
arg1
bel0
JUL 5 4PM ET
ned4
crc3
JUL 8 4PM ET
bra1
ger7
JUL 9 4PM ET
arg4
ned2
JUL 12 4PM ET
bra0
ned3
JUL 13 3PM ET
arg0
ger1

Why It Was Time For Rafa Benitez To Leave

 Why It Was Time For Rafa Benitez To Leave

There can no be no denying that Rafael Benitez has done a good job at Liverpool. His ever growing number of acolytes of the Liverpool persuasion would of course point to Istanbul, Cardiff, Old Trafford and Fernando Torres. He further helped re-establish Liverpool as a European force who could consistently challenge, if not for the Premier League, certainly for the Champions League where his record is superb. In only one season, 2005-06, did Liverpool not reach the Quarter Finals, and on two occasions they have reached the final, winning in 2005. The league performances (until last season) of 5th, 3rd, 3rd, 4th, 2nd further suggest that Benitez had built up a large enough body of work to deserve a ‘written off’ season of transition. Perhaps Benitez felt that the 2008-09 season was so positive that he could afford to try and re-invent his side into a more swashbuckling outfit capable of winning the title, without the risk of it going wrong and him losing his job, but his admirable game of chance didn’t pay off. Maybe he underestimated the capacity for it all to go wrong. But it did go wrong, really really badly.

In almost any other club, the disaster of last season would have been written off as ‘transitional’. But with the stakes so high at Liverpool – not only the ‘culture of success’ ever-present at a club like Liverpool, but with the financial situation being so delicate, dealings in the transfer market simply have to succeed instantly much more often than not to secure the future of the club. Benitez’s series of abysmal flops – Fernando Morientes, Jermaine Pennant, Andrea Dossena, Robbie Keane – when compared to the success stories – Pepe Reina, Javier Mascherano, Yossi Benayoun, Xabi Alonso, Daniel Agger and Fernando Torres – and the sort-of-alright-signings-that-cannot-be-described-as-flops-but-have-not-really-been-totally-successful (Crouch, Riera, Kuyt, Lucas, Bellamy, Johnson, Aquilani) suggests that Benitez’s success rate is slightly better than 1 in 3. With money scarce and the need for constant improvement… er, constant, Benitez’s record in the transfer market is not quite good enough for Liverpool’s current situation. In contrast to Ferguson, whose club are in a similar financial mess to Liverpool’s (worse in some ways) his one great purchase last season, Luis Antonio Valencia, was very successful for the money spent.

The horrendous season that recently passed suggests that Benitez’s signings have not improved the team greatly. In an attempt to re-invent his team in a more attractive, expansive fashion by purchasing attack minded, injury prone, mercurial players (Aquilani, Johnson to replace Alonso and Arbeloa) rather than filling the other holes that lingered in his squad (left back, reserve centre forward, right wing) with cheaper, more dependable (less injury prone) signings, Benitez has killed the goose that laid the golden egg. He would maybe not have left if Liverpool had finished third and reached the Champions League quarter finals, for example, something his stodgy, consistent side of 2005-2008 delivered consistently and (almost) without fail. In a sense poetically for a manager whose teams famously lacked ambition in a tactical sense, Benitez’s ambition left his teams lacking in key areas. As it cannot be presumed with any certainty that Rafa could correct the problems he created without at least some expense (he needed some, not a great amount of expenditure in 2004, but Houllier’s Liverpool never finished seventh) and as Liverpool do not have a great amount of money, the owners felt that they could get better value for money elsewhere.

Ultimately therefore, whilst Rafa Benitez did a commendable job at Liverpool for the vast majority of it, his inadequacies in the transfer market, as well as his previous mistakes and the increasingly problematic financial situation at the club suggests that it was right for him to leave, as he did with his pride and dignity in tact.

(you can follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/mickyscallon)

This entry was posted in General, Leagues: EPL. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Why It Was Time For Rafa Benitez To Leave

  1. hank says:

    Liverpool’s failure this season was a huge disappointment (especially after the relative success last season), but I have a gut feeling we may regret this decision. Rafa may was not perfect, but he’s a top-quality manager. Who will replace him? The names I’ve heard have just been wishful thinking.

    Anyway, hopefully I’ll be proven wrong.

    • Red20 says:

      I really don’t think we’ll regret this decision. It was time for him to leave IMO. Last year seemed like a team that lacked motivation and any consistent effort and I think he was in part responsible for that. I really wonder if his cold nature towards his players just wears thin in the locker room over time.

      As for his replacement? Dalglish makes so much sense that I can’t think of an alternative. He’s a legend that could draw respect from supporters and players alike. He’s been with the club these last couple years, so he should know the inner workings and just how messed up things are behind the scenes. If he’s willing to take on the job, I think he’s the perfect fit.

  2. Matthew N says:

    Who is going to replace Benitez? The owners have no money. No one will take this job because they aren’t going to get a cent to buy players with. Torres, Gerrard, and Masch are all being targeted by massive clubs with unlimited budgets.

    Benitez was not the problem. We are 100% no doubt worse off today than we were a few days ago.

  3. Eious says:

    His transfer record was pretty much a joke. He claimed the owners restricted him yet the total amount that he bought was top 4 in the league the last 5 years.

    He was an idiot with in-game changes as well

    very over-rated

  4. Cricketlover says:

    Liverpool were always known for their open style of play and were a pleasure to watch. Under Benitez the style of play was restrictive and he controlled almsot everything the team did on the field leaving nothing to creativity. Former players have spoken of how every move performed on match day is rehearsed in training. Benitez always stuck with his tactics and was never one who changed anything during a match as seen by his substitutions (he never made tactical substitutions at half-time). Liverpool was one of the only teams who played like the away team when leading at home. Shocking. It was time for him to leave. He was lucky to win the CL and FA Cup as both matches were won on penalties.

    Hopefully, now Liverpool can bring in a manager who will turn the team into one that supporters can identify with and have the team play creative football.

    • Simon Burke says:

      Not sure I’d agree with Liverpool’s style of play. In the 80′s you’d knock it around and at the first sign of trouble knock it back to Grobbelar who’d pick it up (thank God for the backpass rule coming into effect). Under Houllier you were awful to watch – absolutely unwatchable near the end of his reign.
      Benitez did win 2 titles on pens but its a stretch to say he didnt deserve either as a result. I thought he was flawed but I dont think many could have done as well under the Americans he had above him (and Rick Parry evidently).

      Pray you dont get the financial black hole that is Sven.

  5. Django says:

    To argue that it’s “time for him to go” without any discussion of the context in which the dismissal occurred is short-sighted and ill-informed at best. That it was Rafa is only a side story.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>