Sign up for the free World Soccer Talk daily email newsletter featuring news, TV schedules and more »

MON, 3:45PM ET
WED, 3:30PM ET
WED, 3:45PM ET

West Ham 1-3 Wolves: Wanderers Hammer Zola

west ham wolves telegraph West Ham 1 3 Wolves: Wanderers Hammer Zola

Despite what the headline in Tuesday night’s Daily Telegraph says (see above picture), the scoreline in the West Ham United against Wolverhampton Wanderers was 3-1 to Wolves, not 3-0. But it may as well been 3-0 such was the way that Wolves annihilated Gianfranco Zola’s West Ham United with three clinical goals that were top class.

All three Wolves goals were carbon copies of each other and all three were scored by different marksmen. The first was a wonderful finish by Kevin Doyle who took advantage of a dreadful back pass by West Ham defender James Tomkins to slot the ball low and hard into the corner of the net. Fernando Torres would have been proud of a goal like that.

The second goal for Wolves was again the result of poor defending by West Ham United when an errant pass was picked up by Wanderers and this time it was Ronald Zubar who slotted the ball into the far corner to make it two nil to the Midlands club.

The third goal was again a wonderful piece of skill. This time it was Matt Jarvis’s turn who got past some West Ham United defenders and kicked the ball low and hard past the reach of Robert Green.

All three goals were so superb that if they had been scored by Manchester United, you would have seen the goals over and over again as evidence of how skillful the side is.

In injury time, Guillermo Franco pulled one back for West Ham United with a cheeky lob over Marcus Hahnemann but the damage had already been done and there was no way back for the Hammers.

It’s one thing to lose at home, but it’s another thing to lose by such a large margin against a team nestled at the same end of the Premier League table. Not to take anything away from Wolves, because they were superb, but West Ham United will get relegated if they keep on defending like that.

Based on Tuesday night’s performance, Zola’s days at the Boleyn Ground are numbered unless he’s committed to turning around this team and getting them to play as more of a unit. Too many times on Tuesday night, the Hammers completely lost their shape and there were massive gaps open for Wolves to plough right through.

As for Wolves, this is a team that has enjoyed three brilliant back-to-back performances in a row with wins over Burnley and West Ham United as well as a point against Aston Villa in a game that Wolves could have won. Overall this season, Wolves has been an incredibly frustrating team to watch because any time they created a chance in front of goal they would scuff the opportunity and never seem to elevate their performance. Finally tonight they showed what they’re made of and are now on a bounce at the perfect time of the season to help keep them in the Premier League. Can they stay up? Based on performances like tonight, let’s hope so.

About Christopher Harris

Founder and publisher of World Soccer Talk, Christopher Harris is the managing editor of the site. He has been interviewed by The New York Times, The Guardian and several other publications. Plus he has made appearances on NPR, BBC World, CBC, BBC Five Live, talkSPORT and beIN SPORT. Harris, who has lived in Florida since 1984, has supported Swansea City since 1979. He's also an expert on soccer in South Florida, and got engaged during half-time of a MLS game. Harris launched EPL Talk in 2005, which was rebranded as World Soccer Talk in 2013.
View all posts by Christopher Harris →

6 Responses to West Ham 1-3 Wolves: Wanderers Hammer Zola

  1. logan says:

    this sickens me. I feel like Zola really has the makings of a good manager, especially with Steve Clarke behind him, but maybe it’s just not true. I don’t know but my Irons have been truly awful at times this season, and today was one of them. I still think West Ham stays up, but maybe I’m overly optimistic.

  2. unclesand says:

    telegraph’s a crap website, anyway. stick to the guardian.

  3. I feel that calling the setup for the first goal a “backpass” is an insult to the concept of the backpass. I would perhaps use “gift,” or “catastrophic lapse in skill,” or “proof James Tomkins is a double-agent on Wolves’ payroll.”

  4. jason says:

    Yeah..WHU for the drop! Keep it up guys. You stink. Now its up to Burnley and Hull City to step it up. Unfortunately they stink too. But at least they can come up with some magical home performance a couple of times before season’s end, particulary Burnley.

  5. Hammerin' Man says:

    Spineless performance again. FFS, Pompey knows they’re going down, but at least they’ve got some bottle and fight back.

    Jason. Mate, let’s be honest. West Ham have been shite this season, but they won’t go down unless they out-shite Burnley and Hull…
    Then again, we’ve had better teams go down….

  6. Tom Hingley says:

    Let’s be fair. I think the Gaffer gets it right.

    As bad as WH were, Wolves were good. We had confidence, spirit, no lack of skill and scored three very good goals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>