Mark your calendar for Thursday at 6pm ET to participate in the Simon Evans Reddit AMA »

MON, 3:45PM ET
WED, 3:30PM ET
WED, 3:45PM ET

Manchester United For Sale At a Bargain Price of £1.2m

manchester united for sale Manchester United For Sale At a Bargain Price of £1.2m

Manchester United is for sale and is the subject of a takeover at a bargain price of £1.2 million according to The Daily Express. Except that it isn’t £1.2 million, it’s £1.2 billion (they flubbed the headline). And if The Daily Express can’t get the headline correct, how trustworthy is the actual story itself?

You can see the headline flub here (until they correct their mistake).

As for the story itself, the article contains no quotes from anyone about a supposed Manchester United takeover and there’s no attribution about the supposed story of United putting feelers out to Middle East buyers. Typical Express rubbish.

In the meantime, for a serious article by a much more qualified publication, read David Conn’s piece in The Observer in Sunday entitled The Premier League On Borrowed Time.

This entry was posted in General, Leagues: EPL and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

About Christopher Harris

Founder and publisher of World Soccer Talk, Christopher Harris is the managing editor of the site. He has been interviewed by The New York Times, The Guardian and several other publications. Plus he has made appearances on NPR, BBC World, CBC, BBC Five Live, talkSPORT and beIN SPORT. Harris, who has lived in Florida since 1984, has supported Swansea City since 1979. He's also an expert on soccer in South Florida, and got engaged during half-time of a MLS game. Harris launched EPL Talk in 2005, which was rebranded as World Soccer Talk in 2013.
View all posts by Christopher Harris →

6 Responses to Manchester United For Sale At a Bargain Price of £1.2m

  1. Tyson says:

    LOL. I hope this is complete BS the UAE is collapsing under debt with Dubai bankrupt if the Glazers sell it to these morons the club really will be finished in a few years.

  2. El Cid says:

    Ideally the Club should be British in every sense. We have millions of supporters and if the fans set their minds to it the Club can be theirs. The Glazers are afterall glazers. In any case, a wealthy sheikh, with love for the Club, will be a lot better than even one-tenth or even a millionth part of a Glazer.

  3. Jose says:

    This is unrelated to the article but came to mind when seeing the figures. Do you Gaffer, or anyone else reading, feel like following football over the years has numbed you to what, in everyday life, would be an extrodinary sum of money? There are times when I notice myself passing off 5 or 10 million as nothing, simply considering it in terms of what it could buy you in a transfer market with no thought whatsoever to the actual amount / value. Has this happened to you?

    • The Gaffer says:

      Jose, that’s an excellent question and I completely agree. The massive sums I read about each day – whether it’s player wages or club debt – makes 5 or 10 million seem like nothing.

      I was having a conversation the other day about how ridiculous the title of a particular TV show from the 1970s sounds today. It was “The Six Million Dollar Man.” Back then it seemed like a massive number, but if the TV show came back in this decade, it would have to be something like “The One Billion Dollar Man” to have the same effect.

      The Gaffer

  4. ovalball says:

    Thanks for the link to the Observer article. Sobering reading for all clubs and fans.

    2012-2013 is just around the corner. I don’t think the EPL can/will clean up shop by then. So, who’s going to blink…..the EPL or UEFA?

  5. Havoc says:

    Qatar is NOT part of the UAE and actually owns Porsche and VW…they have the money and no recession worries.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>