Powered by
Univision Deportes
JUL 5 12PM ET
arg1
bel0
JUL 5 4PM ET
ned4
crc3
JUL 8 4PM ET
bra1
ger7
JUL 9 4PM ET
arg4
ned2
JUL 12 4PM ET
bra0
ned3
JUL 13 3PM ET
arg0
ger1

Superliga Begins Amidst Controversy

pachuca celebrate2 Superliga Begins Amidst Controversy

Pachuca’s Players split a $1 million bonus for winning the Superliga in 2007. Had the LA Galaxy won, their players would have split $150,000 /Photo from the AP

The MLS Players Union has rained on the Superliga parade set to begin today. The union released the following statement which I reprint from Steve Goff’s Washington Post story:

“MLS is misleading its great fans. What has not been revealed by the league is that its New York office has unilaterally set its own bonus structure for players, who will receive only a small fraction of the $1 million. On top of that, the league has gone even further by prohibiting its teams from providing their own bonus pool for their players, despite the fact that this right is protected under the league’s CBA. The Union has filed a grievance regarding this issue, which will be arbitrated later this year.”

“Given the time and travel requirements and injury risk for players, the prize money at stake (which MLS has consistently touted in the press), and the revenue generated through home games, it is entirely reasonable for players to expect a larger bonus pool. The Union and the players participating in this tournament believe that SuperLiga is a great tournament and hope that it will be around for a long time. It’s a shame that MLS doesn’t pay its players – the persons responsible for making the tournament exciting – their fair share of the proceeds. Their refusal to do so has left the players with a bitter taste in their mouths as they enter the tournament.”

“As a result, if an MLS team wins SuperLiga the players on that team won’t split $1 million. Instead, they will receive only 15% of the prize money. This puts MLS players at a significant competitive disadvantage as the Mexican clubs are not operating under the same rules. Indeed, it is our understanding that the players on last year’s winner Pachuca split the entire $1 million prize amongst themselves.”

 

So essentially what appears to be a great tournament and concept is amounting to little more than a cash grab by SUM and MLS? Perhaps not, but the appearance is not good from this vantage point. Even more troubling is that MLS congested its most successful clubs schedules during FIFA international breaks forcing clubs to play multiple games a week shorthanded to clear the calender for this tournament. I for one enjoy all international competitions and will continue to give Superliga coverage befitting of a champions league like tournament for this region, which it is, but those who take the event less seriously given this revelation can be forgiven.

More on this story can be found thanks to our friend Luis Bueno’s excellent reporting at Sideline Views.  

About Kartik Krishnaiyer

A lifelong lover of soccer, the beautiful game, he served from January 2010 until May 2013 as the Director of Communications and Public Relations for the North American Soccer League (NASL). Raised on the Fort Lauderdale Strikers of the old NASL, Krishnaiyer previously hosted the American Soccer Show on the Champions Soccer Radio Network, the Major League Soccer Talk podcast and the EPL Talk Podcast. His soccer writing has been featured by several media outlets including The Guardian and The Telegraph. He is the author of the book Blue With Envy about Manchester City FC. View all posts by Kartik Krishnaiyer →
This entry was posted in Leagues: Major League Soccer, Superliga. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Superliga Begins Amidst Controversy

  1. JOHN ROE says:

    THIS MAKES ME REALLY UNHAPPY.

    WHY IS THE MLS AND SUM CONTINUING TO HORDE ALL THE $$$$$.

    TEAMS DON’T KEEP THE TRANSFER FEES AND DON’T KEEP HALF THE $$$$$ THEY EARN FOR THE LEAGUE. THIS IS TOO MUCH. SUPERLIGA IS GREAT IDEA, BUT LIKE ALL GREAT IDEAS CONNECTED WITH SUM OR MLS, IT BECOMES A CASH GRAB.

    BARCA WAS A GREAT IDEA BUT IS A CASH GRAB.

    MEXICO PLAYING GAMES IN THE US IS A GREAT IDEA BUT HAS TURNED INTO A CASH GRAB.

    NOW SUPERLIGA IS GREAT FOR A MEXICAN TEAM IF THEY WIN IT BUT WORTHLESS FOR AN MLS TEAM.

    ABSOLUTE UTTER B/S.

  2. bandeeto says:

    despicable! horrific! completely uncalled for! I would love to call and/or email SUM/MLS and give them my $.02.

    the reasoning behind their miserly spending in all other areas is that our league is so young, not well enough supported, and just doesn’t have the money to pay it’s players much more. In SuperLigas case that’s a load of crap. THEY HAVE THE MONEY AND MLS TEAMS STILL WON’T GET WHAT THEY DESERVE!

    However i am proud of our teams fo playing with so much passion even while being held down by their own organization.

  3. Football Detective says:

    SUM = MONOPOLY

  4. Torres says:

    u wonder why mls is not taken seriously by mexican fans?

    mexico knows usa has good players. donovan is one of the best in the world. it’s this sort of issue. mls is simply not a real footballing league. the clubs are simply controlled by the leagues. if they did that in mexico, if fmf tried to stifle the clubs people would be in the streets. no such thing here though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>