THURS, 1PM ET
LIL
EVE
THURS, 1PM ET
LIE
SEV
THURS, 3PM ET
TOT
TRI
THURS, 3PM ET
INT
ETI
THURS, 3PM ET
VIL
ZUR
THURS, 3PM ET
MON
APO

Why Premier League's Game 39 is Good for America

premierleague Why Premier League's Game 39 is Good for AmericaIt’s been a trying week for Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore. After unveiling the Game 39 proposal last week, the plan has today been rejected by the Asian Football Confederation and has received a lukewarm response from the U.S. Soccer Federation.

With the Asian Football Confederation rejecting the proposal, that one decision could be enough to kill the proposal. Why? If the Premier League had to pick one continent to play an extra round of games in 2011, Asia would be it.

With a massive population, Asia holds the key to the enormous amounts of additional revenue the Premier League can make in the future through TV rights deals. Those lucrative TV deals in Asia are currently vastly undervalued and there’s massive potential to make so much more money if there’s increased demand from the Asian public and competition from Asian media companies.

In the United States, it’s a different matter entirely. The Premier League routinely get 300,000 viewers for matches shown on Fox Soccer Channel, while even the biggest games of the season get less than 1 million viewers in North and South America combined.

But it’s possible that the Premier League may want to use the United States and the Middle East to help market its Game 39 idea, which could then potentially open the door to Asia in forthcoming years if the Asian market changed its mind based on how successful the experiment is.

The Premier League still has a long way to go before it can even consider launching the Game 39 Proposal. Right now, the organization that will dictate whether the idea will fly or not is FIFA.

U.S. Soccer president Sunil Gulati is open to the idea of sanctioning the matches in the United States if FIFA approves the proposal. Major League Soccer Deputy Commissioner Ivan Gazidis, meanwhile, is open to the proposal too — again, as long as FIFA sanctions it.

If FIFA gives the green light to the Premier League, here are the reasons why I believe that U.S. and Major League Soccer will benefit from hosting some or all of the Game 39 matches in the States:

  1. The David Beckham effect. One of the main reasons why attendances at Major League Soccer matches this season increased was due to casual fans or people with little or no interest in soccer attending the matches. If the Premier League works in conjunction with Major League Soccer, the host cities in the United States could organize double-headers. The first match would be a friendly involving two teams from Major League Soccer, while the second match would be a Premier League encounter.Organizing these double-headers will bring in new sets of fans that wouldn’t typically go see a MLS match. The hope is that these newbie fans will be impressed enough by what they see from the Major League Soccer teams that they’ll continue coming back when the regular season begins.
  2. Media exposure. David Beckham joining the LA Galaxy put Major League Soccer on the map around the world during the past 12 months, which even included the mainstream U.S. media. Having some of the most famous clubs in soccer history visit the States (Manchester United, Arsenal, Liverpool, etc) will help increase awareness and visibility in the U.S. for soccer, as well as generating positive media articles for U.S. soccer around the world (just as the 1994 World Cup did, where most journalists praised one of the best organized tournaments in the history of Copa Mundial).
  3. Level playing field. Oftentimes unfairly, Major League Soccer has been kicked and bruised by pundits around the world (even in America and especially in England). The league has been the bane of jokes comparing the technical level to Conference side clubs and picking up nicknames such as the “Mickey Mouse League.” While playing double-headers will be no guarantee of a fair and accurate analysis by the British press, it will give these reporters an opportunity to learn more about the American game first-hand and to see how the technical level and entertainment value is above or below their expectations.
  4. Money, money, money. Whether Game 39 is a good thing for English football and the Premier League is another matter entirely. The one thing that is certain is that it’ll provide the Premier League clubs with several million pounds of cash. It’ll also therefore be a good opportunity for MLS and U.S. Soccer to generate additional revenue for their organizations — which is something that they’ll be eager to discuss.

If FIFA sanctions the Game 39 Proposal, I truly believe that the United States will benefit greatly from hosting the matches in the U.S. Both MLS and the U.S. Soccer Federation will find itself with a lot of leverage to ensure that the agreements made with the Premier League are beneficial to the United States.

This entry was posted in General, Leagues: EPL. Bookmark the permalink.

About Christopher Harris

Founder and publisher of World Soccer Talk, Christopher Harris is the managing editor of the site. He has been interviewed by The New York Times, The Guardian and several other publications. Plus he has made appearances on NPR, BBC World, CBC, BBC Five Live, talkSPORT and beIN SPORT. Harris, who has lived in Florida since 1984, has supported Swansea City since 1979. He's also an expert on soccer in South Florida, and got engaged during half-time of a MLS game. Harris launched EPL Talk in 2005, which was rebranded as World Soccer Talk in 2013.
View all posts by Christopher Harris →

12 Responses to Why Premier League's Game 39 is Good for America

  1. Tippo says:

    The Middle East is part of the Asian confederation and therefore if the AFC does not sanction those matches then they will also not be played in the Middle East.

    I fully support the AFC in not supporting the Game 39 plan and I hope CAF will also come and say no to those plans as well.

  2. TheScout says:

    I’m confused on point 3. How will English teams playing in America convince the Brits that MLS is not “mickey mouse”?

    Even if they do manage to schedule a friendly against an MLS side, they won’t play their top-XI if they have a League match in the same weekend. And…if the B-team manage to beat the MLS side, friendly or not, it will only re-inforce the image of inferiority that the British press seems to have of MLS.

  3. The Gaffer says:

    Scout,

    Good observation. What I mean by number three is that the British press will most probably be present to view the first game between the MLS sides so they’ll be able to view a back-to-back comparison between how two MLS sides compare against each other and how two Premier League sides compare playing against each other.

    I’m not suggesting that the MLS sides play any friendlies against the Premier League sides while they’re here.

    Cheers,
    The Gaffer

  4. eplnfl says:

    Well, thanks for coming out on the pro-side of the 39th game issue. I do not think it will increase British acceptance of the MLS, but in my opinion exposure to world class club football, in a game that means something will be a big plus for the game in America.

  5. Kartik says:

    I respectfully completely totally disagree. Besides it is illegal under FIFA rules. The EPL cannot have a club in Scotland for a reason. You cannot play competitive matches in a nation with a FIFA sanctioned first division. If they do and MLS goes along with it as has been reported since the PL will split the money with SUM (an arm of MLS) both leagues should be expelled from FIFA and lose their first division status. In other words the 20 PL clubs go back to the Football League and MLS shuts down, and those clubs either fold or join the Mexican Primera Division (if they will have them).

    This whole proposal is insulting to fans in England and the USA. Why the PL in the face of opposition from all corners continues to promote is something that needs to be discussed and why the English FA is allowing the PL to conduct itself in a completely disrespectful and improper manner is also of serious concern.

  6. peleorei says:

    I am for the 39th game in the US it would be great to see the EPL played in MLS stadium’s around the country. It would create a huge buzz and excitement for MLS fans.

  7. Specter says:

    I stated the MLS/Prem double header in an email I set to Premier League Radio (Was read after the Arsenal vs. Blackburn game). Obviously, great minds think alike ;)

    But I also talked about what the USSF has came out and said. That they won’t allow the prem to play here if FIFA does not sanction round 39. Thats idiotic in my opinion, cause basically they’ve told the prem that they aren’t necessarily welcome, and that they can plan to play elsewhere.

  8. wanderer_abroad says:

    Completely agree with Kartik. Its illegal and would a said a dangerous example. Clubs would think they could get away with anything.

  9. Pingback: Proposed Premiership Expansion has Silver Lining | EPL Talk

  10. AtlantaPompey says:

    Home and Away against every team in the Premiership is the integrity of the league. Under this proposal, somebody plays ManU three times and somebody plays Derby three times. What if one of those teams makes the UEFA Cup and the other doesn’t and the difference is the points acquired/lost in that match? What if relegation is determined by those points? Strength of schedule is a big argument in American College Football. It doesn’t exist in the EPL. It will now if this proposal goes through.

    Also, asking two teams to fly to Sydney is a lot more difficult than flying to New York City. In an already crowded fixture list, adding one more match involving a long plane flight is stress these players don’t need.

    Putting an MLS game before an EPL game would only highlight the differences between the two leagues. Do we really want a direct comparison? I don’t think so.

    Don’t get me wrong, if there is a good matchup in America, I’ll probably go, especially if it’s Pompey, but this fundamentally changes the competitive nature of the league.

  11. Specter says:

    Are the matches going to count toward the table? I thought it was just more or less a friendly. If points are at stake, then that changes my view quite a lot. That would not be fair, plain and simple.

  12. Shakira Graham says:

    Yes, the matches will count towards the table.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>